"New technologies such as solar systems or hybrid cars aren't created overnight. By extending these tax credits we are giving this industry time to grow, branch out and succeed"
About this Quote
Industrial policy, dressed up as patience.
Hayworth frames clean energy not as an environmental crusade but as a classic American growth story: a young industry that needs a little runway before it can fly on its own. The language is deliberate. “Aren’t created overnight” lowers expectations and preemptively answers critics who want instant market transformation. It converts slow progress from a liability into proof of seriousness: if the tech takes time, then support is simply realism, not ideology.
The real work happens in the phrase “extending these tax credits.” “Extending” implies continuity and steadiness, as if government isn’t intervening so much as keeping a sensible promise. Tax credits themselves are politically shrewd: they sound like tax relief rather than spending, letting a conservative audience accept state-backed innovation without calling it a subsidy. It’s a rhetorical bridge between free-market identity and the fact that markets don’t automatically bankroll early-stage infrastructure.
Then there’s the botanical metaphor: “grow, branch out and succeed.” That naturalizes the industry, suggesting clean tech is the next inevitable limb of the economy, not an artificial product of regulation. It also smuggles in a job-and-competitiveness argument: give it time and it will “succeed,” meaning produce companies, factories, and voters who benefit.
Context matters: mid-2000s debates over energy security, rising fuel prices, and emerging climate politics. Hayworth’s intent reads as permission-making - a way to justify pro-renewable policy within a Republican vocabulary of investment, entrepreneurship, and temporizing pragmatism rather than green moralizing.
Hayworth frames clean energy not as an environmental crusade but as a classic American growth story: a young industry that needs a little runway before it can fly on its own. The language is deliberate. “Aren’t created overnight” lowers expectations and preemptively answers critics who want instant market transformation. It converts slow progress from a liability into proof of seriousness: if the tech takes time, then support is simply realism, not ideology.
The real work happens in the phrase “extending these tax credits.” “Extending” implies continuity and steadiness, as if government isn’t intervening so much as keeping a sensible promise. Tax credits themselves are politically shrewd: they sound like tax relief rather than spending, letting a conservative audience accept state-backed innovation without calling it a subsidy. It’s a rhetorical bridge between free-market identity and the fact that markets don’t automatically bankroll early-stage infrastructure.
Then there’s the botanical metaphor: “grow, branch out and succeed.” That naturalizes the industry, suggesting clean tech is the next inevitable limb of the economy, not an artificial product of regulation. It also smuggles in a job-and-competitiveness argument: give it time and it will “succeed,” meaning produce companies, factories, and voters who benefit.
Context matters: mid-2000s debates over energy security, rising fuel prices, and emerging climate politics. Hayworth’s intent reads as permission-making - a way to justify pro-renewable policy within a Republican vocabulary of investment, entrepreneurship, and temporizing pragmatism rather than green moralizing.
Quote Details
| Topic | Technology |
|---|
More Quotes by D. Hayworth
Add to List
