"New technology is useful, but it's inefficient and ugly; it knows it'll be obsolete by lunchtime tomorrow, so it has no incentive to be anything else"
About this Quote
Holt’s jab lands because it treats technology like a smug temp worker: hired to solve a problem fast, fully aware it won’t be around long enough to face consequences. Calling new tech “useful” grants the obvious concession, then he twists the knife with “inefficient and ugly,” a deliberate inversion of the sales pitch that always frames innovation as sleeker, faster, cleaner. The real punchline is the personification: technology “knows” it will be obsolete by “lunchtime tomorrow.” That compressed timeline is satire doing what it does best, shrinking a cultural anxiety into a single petty, familiar image.
The subtext is a critique of the upgrade treadmill and the incentives that drive it. When a product’s lifespan is measured in hype cycles, the market rewards novelty over refinement. Bugs can be patched later, interfaces can be awkward, hardware can be disposable - because the next iteration is already on the runway. Holt isn’t arguing that engineers are incompetent; he’s implying the system is rationally producing ugliness. If obsolescence is guaranteed, elegance becomes optional, and durability becomes almost irrational.
Contextually, this reads like late-20th/early-21st-century consumer tech culture: constant releases, planned obsolescence, and a design language optimized for unboxing rather than living. The line also skewers our complicity. We’ve learned to treat friction as normal, even chic, so long as it’s new. Holt’s comedy works because it reframes that bargain as a moral failing: not of the gadget, but of the world that taught it there’s no point in growing up.
The subtext is a critique of the upgrade treadmill and the incentives that drive it. When a product’s lifespan is measured in hype cycles, the market rewards novelty over refinement. Bugs can be patched later, interfaces can be awkward, hardware can be disposable - because the next iteration is already on the runway. Holt isn’t arguing that engineers are incompetent; he’s implying the system is rationally producing ugliness. If obsolescence is guaranteed, elegance becomes optional, and durability becomes almost irrational.
Contextually, this reads like late-20th/early-21st-century consumer tech culture: constant releases, planned obsolescence, and a design language optimized for unboxing rather than living. The line also skewers our complicity. We’ve learned to treat friction as normal, even chic, so long as it’s new. Holt’s comedy works because it reframes that bargain as a moral failing: not of the gadget, but of the world that taught it there’s no point in growing up.
Quote Details
| Topic | Technology |
|---|
More Quotes by Tom
Add to List
