"Newspapers are the second hand of history. This hand, however, is usually not only of inferior metal to the other hands, it also seldom works properly"
About this Quote
Schopenhauer is doing what he does best: turning a seemingly neutral metaphor into a diagnosis of human self-deception. Calling newspapers the "second hand of history" sounds, at first, like a compliment to journalism's role in timestamping events, making the present legible as it slips into the past. Then he twists the blade. This second hand is cheap, unreliable, badly calibrated. History, in this view, still gets told - but through a mechanism designed for speed, not truth.
The intent is less to dunk on printers than to warn readers about mistaking immediacy for accuracy. Newspapers promise synchronization: everyone sees the world at the same time. Schopenhauer's subtext is that mass attention is not the same as knowledge. The press doesn't merely report; it manufactures a shared tempo, an emotional rhythm, and a set of priorities. If that hand "seldom works properly", it's because the incentives are misaligned: novelty beats nuance, narrative beats contradiction, and being first beats being right.
Context matters. Schopenhauer is writing in a 19th-century Europe where literacy, urban publics, and partisan papers are exploding. "History" is no longer just chronicles and state archives; it's daily copy, commodified and politicized. His cynicism isn't timeless pessimism so much as an early critique of the information economy: when the clock of public life is powered by attention, the time it tells will always be a little wrong - and the damage is cumulative.
The intent is less to dunk on printers than to warn readers about mistaking immediacy for accuracy. Newspapers promise synchronization: everyone sees the world at the same time. Schopenhauer's subtext is that mass attention is not the same as knowledge. The press doesn't merely report; it manufactures a shared tempo, an emotional rhythm, and a set of priorities. If that hand "seldom works properly", it's because the incentives are misaligned: novelty beats nuance, narrative beats contradiction, and being first beats being right.
Context matters. Schopenhauer is writing in a 19th-century Europe where literacy, urban publics, and partisan papers are exploding. "History" is no longer just chronicles and state archives; it's daily copy, commodified and politicized. His cynicism isn't timeless pessimism so much as an early critique of the information economy: when the clock of public life is powered by attention, the time it tells will always be a little wrong - and the damage is cumulative.
Quote Details
| Topic | Truth |
|---|---|
| Source | Arthur Schopenhauer, Parerga and Paralipomena (1851), essay "On Newspapers" (German: "Ueber Zeitungen"). Common English rendering appears in E. F. J. Payne translation (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974). |
More Quotes by Arthur
Add to List








