"No amount of humanitarian assistance can protect people from being attacked"
About this Quote
Aid is a bandage in a firing range, and Jan Egeland is deliberately refusing the comforting fiction that more boxes, more tents, more convoys can substitute for safety. The sentence is built like a hard stop: "No amount" shuts down bargaining, "humanitarian assistance" invokes the entire moral economy of modern crisis response, and "can protect" punctures the implicit promise that generosity equals security. It is a rebuke aimed as much at donors and diplomats as at perpetrators: you can fund relief with one hand and tolerate the conditions for violence with the other.
Egeland speaks from the field logic of humanitarianism, where agencies are expected to be neutral, practical, and relentlessly solution-oriented. That background makes the line sharper. Its subtext is institutional frustration: humanitarians are routinely asked to mop up after political failure, then praised for resilience as if resilience were the goal. The quote insists that protection is not a deliverable you can warehouse. It is a political and military fact created by ceasefires, access guarantees, enforcement, and accountability.
The context is the recurrent pattern of contemporary conflicts - besieged cities, refugee corridors turned into targets, hospitals hit, aid workers killed - where assistance can even become a magnet for attack. Egeland is also inoculating against a familiar PR cycle: images of aid drops stand in for action while the violence continues. His intent is to shift the conversation from charity to responsibility, from logistics to power, and to make the uncomfortable point that the most "humanitarian" act may be stopping the attacker, not shipping another pallet.
Egeland speaks from the field logic of humanitarianism, where agencies are expected to be neutral, practical, and relentlessly solution-oriented. That background makes the line sharper. Its subtext is institutional frustration: humanitarians are routinely asked to mop up after political failure, then praised for resilience as if resilience were the goal. The quote insists that protection is not a deliverable you can warehouse. It is a political and military fact created by ceasefires, access guarantees, enforcement, and accountability.
The context is the recurrent pattern of contemporary conflicts - besieged cities, refugee corridors turned into targets, hospitals hit, aid workers killed - where assistance can even become a magnet for attack. Egeland is also inoculating against a familiar PR cycle: images of aid drops stand in for action while the violence continues. His intent is to shift the conversation from charity to responsibility, from logistics to power, and to make the uncomfortable point that the most "humanitarian" act may be stopping the attacker, not shipping another pallet.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|
More Quotes by Jan
Add to List






