"No man chooses evil because it is evil; he only mistakes it for happiness, the good he seeks"
About this Quote
Evil, Wollstonecraft suggests, rarely arrives wearing a villain’s cape; it comes dressed as a promise. The line is a quiet attack on the convenient fantasy that bad people do bad things because they love darkness. Instead, she frames wrongdoing as a species of misrecognition: the same hunger for the good gets routed through a crooked map. That pivot matters because it shifts moral debate away from theatrical condemnation and toward the harder work of diagnosing the conditions that warp desire.
As an 18th-century writer arguing against the era’s tidy hierarchies, Wollstonecraft is also smuggling in a political claim: if people “mistake” harm for happiness, it’s often because society trains them to. When status, property, and masculinity are treated as the primary currencies of worth, cruelty can masquerade as self-respect, domination as security, and conquest as fulfillment. The quote’s soft universalism (“No man…”) reads less like naïveté than strategy: she denies her opponents the comfort of calling injustice “human nature” and makes it instead a problem of education, incentives, and moral formation.
The subtext has bite. If evil is a misread good, then institutions that profit from that misreading bear responsibility. It also complicates punishment as the sole answer; correction requires reshaping what counts as “happiness” in the first place. Wollstonecraft’s intent isn’t to excuse harm, but to strip it of glamour and inevitability, insisting that the route to virtue is practical: better reasoning, better social arrangements, better lives.
As an 18th-century writer arguing against the era’s tidy hierarchies, Wollstonecraft is also smuggling in a political claim: if people “mistake” harm for happiness, it’s often because society trains them to. When status, property, and masculinity are treated as the primary currencies of worth, cruelty can masquerade as self-respect, domination as security, and conquest as fulfillment. The quote’s soft universalism (“No man…”) reads less like naïveté than strategy: she denies her opponents the comfort of calling injustice “human nature” and makes it instead a problem of education, incentives, and moral formation.
The subtext has bite. If evil is a misread good, then institutions that profit from that misreading bear responsibility. It also complicates punishment as the sole answer; correction requires reshaping what counts as “happiness” in the first place. Wollstonecraft’s intent isn’t to excuse harm, but to strip it of glamour and inevitability, insisting that the route to virtue is practical: better reasoning, better social arrangements, better lives.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|
More Quotes by Mary
Add to List











