"No man is good enough to govern any woman without her consent"
About this Quote
Anthony’s line is a clean blade: short, absolute, and designed to cut through the polite euphemisms of her era. “No man” doesn’t leave room for exceptional husbands, enlightened lawmakers, or benevolent clergy. It treats male authority as a category problem, not a personality test. Then she tightens the screw with “good enough,” a phrase that sounds almost moralistic until you realize it’s a trap. If even the best man fails the standard without consent, the entire system of paternal permission collapses.
The genius is in how she reframes governance. She doesn’t argue that women are as capable as men within the existing order; she argues the order itself is illegitimate when it substitutes protection for permission. “Govern” is doing heavy lifting here: Anthony is speaking to voting rights, property laws, custody rules, wages, and bodily autonomy before those terms had their current political vocabulary. She’s describing the everyday fact that a woman could be legally constrained by men who were not just strangers but institutions.
Context matters: post-Civil War America was rewriting the Constitution while leaving women outside the new promises. The country was debating who counted as a political person, and Anthony’s move is to make consent the non-negotiable entry fee for legitimacy. The subtext is also strategic: by using the language of liberal democracy against a democracy that excluded women, she forces her opponents to either abandon consent as a principle or finally apply it consistently.
The genius is in how she reframes governance. She doesn’t argue that women are as capable as men within the existing order; she argues the order itself is illegitimate when it substitutes protection for permission. “Govern” is doing heavy lifting here: Anthony is speaking to voting rights, property laws, custody rules, wages, and bodily autonomy before those terms had their current political vocabulary. She’s describing the everyday fact that a woman could be legally constrained by men who were not just strangers but institutions.
Context matters: post-Civil War America was rewriting the Constitution while leaving women outside the new promises. The country was debating who counted as a political person, and Anthony’s move is to make consent the non-negotiable entry fee for legitimacy. The subtext is also strategic: by using the language of liberal democracy against a democracy that excluded women, she forces her opponents to either abandon consent as a principle or finally apply it consistently.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Susan
Add to List











