"No mistake is more common and more fatuous than appealing to logic in cases which are beyond her jurisdiction"
About this Quote
The subtext is a critique of Victorian self-confidence: an era drunk on scientific progress and rational systems, eager to treat moral life, art, religion, and human motive as solvable equations. Butler, a poet with an evolutionary-age mind and a satirist’s suspicion of piety, is warning against category errors: using the tools of proof where the real work is interpretation, judgment, empathy, or lived experience. There are domains where premises can’t be agreed on, where values are doing the steering, where the “most logical” conclusion is just a well-lit rationalization.
What makes the sentence work is its courtroom framing. Once “jurisdiction” is invoked, “appealing” to logic sounds like calling an expert witness who has no standing. Butler anticipates a very modern pathology: people treating debate as a spreadsheet, then acting surprised when the heart, the crowd, or the sacred refuses to balance.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Butler, Samuel. (2026, January 14). No mistake is more common and more fatuous than appealing to logic in cases which are beyond her jurisdiction. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/no-mistake-is-more-common-and-more-fatuous-than-83393/
Chicago Style
Butler, Samuel. "No mistake is more common and more fatuous than appealing to logic in cases which are beyond her jurisdiction." FixQuotes. January 14, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/no-mistake-is-more-common-and-more-fatuous-than-83393/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"No mistake is more common and more fatuous than appealing to logic in cases which are beyond her jurisdiction." FixQuotes, 14 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/no-mistake-is-more-common-and-more-fatuous-than-83393/. Accessed 7 Feb. 2026.








