"No one has the right to destroy another person's belief by demanding empirical evidence"
About this Quote
The phrase “destroy another person’s belief” frames skepticism as violence, not inquiry. Landers isn’t defending superstition so much as defending the psychological scaffolding people use to get through their days: grief rituals, faith, optimism, family myths. Demanding “empirical evidence” becomes the social equivalent of kicking a cane out from under someone who’s still learning to stand. You can hear her readership in the background: spouses in conflict, children rejecting religion, friends sniping at each other’s coping mechanisms. In that world, the “truth” of the belief is less urgent than the fallout from puncturing it.
There’s also a sly, era-specific politics here. In late-20th-century American life, science is both prestige language and a blunt instrument. Landers cautions against using it as a trump card in intimate relationships, where power dynamics matter as much as facts. The subtext: you may be correct and still be cruel. She’s not banning evidence; she’s arguing that the demand for it can be a form of dominance masquerading as rationality.
Quote Details
| Topic | Faith |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Landers, Ann. (2026, January 15). No one has the right to destroy another person's belief by demanding empirical evidence. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/no-one-has-the-right-to-destroy-another-persons-14281/
Chicago Style
Landers, Ann. "No one has the right to destroy another person's belief by demanding empirical evidence." FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/no-one-has-the-right-to-destroy-another-persons-14281/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"No one has the right to destroy another person's belief by demanding empirical evidence." FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/no-one-has-the-right-to-destroy-another-persons-14281/. Accessed 13 Feb. 2026.






