"No one will expect the British Government or the Government of India to give way to threats of violence, disorder and chaos; and, indeed, representatives of large sections of Indian opinion have expressly warned us that we must not do so"
About this Quote
Cripps is speaking in the cool, procedural register of empire, where “order” is never just order but a moral alibi. The sentence is built like a locked gate: no one will expect us to yield; therefore we cannot yield. It’s clever politics because it recasts a choice as inevitability. By invoking “the British Government” alongside “the Government of India,” he performs a unity that was, in practice, deeply contested in the 1940s, when India’s constitutional future was being fought over in streets, prisons, and negotiating rooms.
The key move is the ventriloquism of legitimacy. “Representatives of large sections of Indian opinion” are deployed as a shield: coercion becomes restraint, refusal becomes responsibility, colonial firmness becomes something Indians themselves allegedly demand. The line doesn’t engage the substance of anticolonial claims; it narrows the debate to a question of tactics, delegitimizing mass agitation by naming it “violence, disorder and chaos.” Those are not neutral descriptors. They’re trigger words designed to make any disruption look like a descent into barbarism, with British authority cast as the only dam holding it back.
Context matters: Cripps was a wartime minister associated with the 1942 Cripps Mission, Britain’s failed attempt to secure Indian cooperation against Japan by offering postwar constitutional change. The failure helped set the stage for Quit India and intensified repression. This quote reads as the paternalistic logic of that moment: concessions are possible, but only when empire’s timetable is respected and dissent stays decorous. The subtext is blunt: negotiate, don’t mobilize; and if you mobilize, we’ll call it chaos and treat it accordingly.
The key move is the ventriloquism of legitimacy. “Representatives of large sections of Indian opinion” are deployed as a shield: coercion becomes restraint, refusal becomes responsibility, colonial firmness becomes something Indians themselves allegedly demand. The line doesn’t engage the substance of anticolonial claims; it narrows the debate to a question of tactics, delegitimizing mass agitation by naming it “violence, disorder and chaos.” Those are not neutral descriptors. They’re trigger words designed to make any disruption look like a descent into barbarism, with British authority cast as the only dam holding it back.
Context matters: Cripps was a wartime minister associated with the 1942 Cripps Mission, Britain’s failed attempt to secure Indian cooperation against Japan by offering postwar constitutional change. The failure helped set the stage for Quit India and intensified repression. This quote reads as the paternalistic logic of that moment: concessions are possible, but only when empire’s timetable is respected and dissent stays decorous. The subtext is blunt: negotiate, don’t mobilize; and if you mobilize, we’ll call it chaos and treat it accordingly.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Stafford
Add to List


