"No passion in the world is equal to the passion to alter someone else's draft"
About this Quote
Nothing flatters the human ego quite like the chance to “help” someone else write. Wells nails a peculiar literary truth: revision isn’t just a craft impulse, it’s a power impulse. “No passion” is deliberately hyperbolic, the kind of overstatement that signals he’s not merely complaining about meddling editors but diagnosing a social reflex. Drafts are intimate and unfinished; they invite projection. The moment you see someone else’s rough sentence, you’re tempted to replace it with the sentence you would have written, and that substitution feels like competence, even generosity.
The subtext is slyly adversarial. “Alter” doesn’t mean improve; it means take possession. Wells frames rewriting as a kind of territorial behavior: marking the page, asserting taste, narrowing ambiguity into your own preferred clarity. The joke cuts because it’s true across hierarchies. Editors do it to authors, colleagues to colleagues, spouses to spouses, even friends in a shared Google Doc. The draft becomes a stage where status gets negotiated under the alibi of polish.
Context matters: Wells worked in an era when publishing was gatekept by editors and magazines, and when authorial voice was increasingly treated as brand and authority. His line is both a writer’s weary wink and a warning about creativity under committee pressure. It also anticipates modern collaboration culture, where “suggestions” can metastasize into identity edits. Wells isn’t romanticizing the lone genius; he’s skewering our tendency to confuse control with care.
The subtext is slyly adversarial. “Alter” doesn’t mean improve; it means take possession. Wells frames rewriting as a kind of territorial behavior: marking the page, asserting taste, narrowing ambiguity into your own preferred clarity. The joke cuts because it’s true across hierarchies. Editors do it to authors, colleagues to colleagues, spouses to spouses, even friends in a shared Google Doc. The draft becomes a stage where status gets negotiated under the alibi of polish.
Context matters: Wells worked in an era when publishing was gatekept by editors and magazines, and when authorial voice was increasingly treated as brand and authority. His line is both a writer’s weary wink and a warning about creativity under committee pressure. It also anticipates modern collaboration culture, where “suggestions” can metastasize into identity edits. Wells isn’t romanticizing the lone genius; he’s skewering our tendency to confuse control with care.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|---|
| Source | Rejected source: The War of the Worlds (Penguin Classics) by H.G. Wells(20... (H.G. Wells, 1946)IA: warofworldspengu0000hgwe
Evidence: he paper fearing the worst had hap pened to me he was restless and after supper prowled out aga Other candidates (2) The Elements of Visual Style (Robert W. Harris, 2007) compilation95.0% ... No passion in the world is equal to the passion to alter someone else's draft . " H.G. Wells Figure 6.28 A block ... Equality (H.G. Wells) compilation40.0% hat all the soil in the world is equally rich the first rate land in kentucky and the highlands |
More Quotes by Wells
Add to List









