"No religion has mandated killing others as a requirement for its sustenance or promotion"
About this Quote
Kalam’s line is a pressure valve disguised as a moral axiom: it tries to separate faith from violence at the exact moment the public conversation keeps stapling them together. Coming from a statesman, not a theologian, the intent is civic more than doctrinal. He’s arguing for social order and national cohesion by insisting that killing is a political corruption of religion, not its operating manual.
The subtext is doing careful diplomatic work. Kalam doesn’t say violence is never committed in religion’s name; he reframes it as unnecessary to religion’s survival. “Mandated” is the key verb: it narrows the charge to institutional requirement, shifting attention from headline atrocities to the internal logic of belief systems. It’s a way of telling majorities and minorities alike: stop treating extremists as authentic representatives, and stop letting them recruit by claiming inevitability. In a country like India, where communal flashpoints can turn quickly into identity-wide blame, that distinction matters.
Context deepens the rhetorical choice. Kalam’s public persona was built on technocratic optimism and pluralist patriotism; he spoke in a register meant to cool temperatures, not win arguments on scripture. The sentence is intentionally broad, almost lawyerly, because its audience is the nation, not a seminar. Its power lies in refusing the extremist premise that violence is the price of belonging. If murder isn’t required for “sustenance or promotion,” then the appeal to sacred duty collapses into something more banal and indictable: power, grievance, and strategy dressed up as piety.
The subtext is doing careful diplomatic work. Kalam doesn’t say violence is never committed in religion’s name; he reframes it as unnecessary to religion’s survival. “Mandated” is the key verb: it narrows the charge to institutional requirement, shifting attention from headline atrocities to the internal logic of belief systems. It’s a way of telling majorities and minorities alike: stop treating extremists as authentic representatives, and stop letting them recruit by claiming inevitability. In a country like India, where communal flashpoints can turn quickly into identity-wide blame, that distinction matters.
Context deepens the rhetorical choice. Kalam’s public persona was built on technocratic optimism and pluralist patriotism; he spoke in a register meant to cool temperatures, not win arguments on scripture. The sentence is intentionally broad, almost lawyerly, because its audience is the nation, not a seminar. Its power lies in refusing the extremist premise that violence is the price of belonging. If murder isn’t required for “sustenance or promotion,” then the appeal to sacred duty collapses into something more banal and indictable: power, grievance, and strategy dressed up as piety.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Abdul
Add to List





