"No sane man can afford to dispense with debilitating pleasures; no ascetic can be considered reliably sane"
About this Quote
Parker turns the moral universe of self-denial upside down, and he does it with the breezy authority of someone who spent a lifetime defending pleasure against puritan suspicion. “Debilitating pleasures” is a deliberately impolite phrase: it acknowledges the hangover, the expense, the calories, the way indulgence can knock you off your clean little schedule. Then he insists those costs aren’t a regrettable side effect but part of the psychological bargain. The punchline lands harder in the second clause, where “ascetic” becomes not virtuous but diagnostically suspect. If you claim you don’t need any of this, Parker implies, you’re either lying or performing.
The specific intent reads like a manifesto from a critic who understood taste as lived experience, not mere discernment. For Parker, pleasure isn’t a garnish on the good life; it’s evidence of contact with it. The subtext is a quiet attack on cultures of optimization: the idea that discipline equals health, that seriousness equals purity, that restraint is automatically enlightened. He’s also poking at the critic’s own temptation toward sterile correctness. A palate trained only to judge, never to succumb, becomes bloodless.
Context matters: coming from a famous wine critic, the line doubles as self-defense and cultural provocation. Wine, by design, lives uncomfortably close to vice. Parker isn’t pretending otherwise; he’s arguing that a controlled flirtation with vice is sanity’s pressure valve. The wit is that he smuggles hedonism into the language of mental hygiene, making indulgence sound less like a sin and more like maintenance.
The specific intent reads like a manifesto from a critic who understood taste as lived experience, not mere discernment. For Parker, pleasure isn’t a garnish on the good life; it’s evidence of contact with it. The subtext is a quiet attack on cultures of optimization: the idea that discipline equals health, that seriousness equals purity, that restraint is automatically enlightened. He’s also poking at the critic’s own temptation toward sterile correctness. A palate trained only to judge, never to succumb, becomes bloodless.
Context matters: coming from a famous wine critic, the line doubles as self-defense and cultural provocation. Wine, by design, lives uncomfortably close to vice. Parker isn’t pretending otherwise; he’s arguing that a controlled flirtation with vice is sanity’s pressure valve. The wit is that he smuggles hedonism into the language of mental hygiene, making indulgence sound less like a sin and more like maintenance.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by Robert
Add to List











