"No, you're either born a writer, a storyteller, or you're not"
About this Quote
John Milius’s line hits like a closed door: talent as blood type, not skill. Coming from a director whose brand is swaggering conviction and mythic masculinity (Conan, Red Dawn, his fingerprints on Apocalypse Now), the absolutism is the point. It’s less a measured theory of creativity than a power move - a way to separate “real” storytellers from the workshop crowd and, not incidentally, to crown a certain kind of instinct-driven, larger-than-life auteur.
The intent is gatekeeping with purpose. In Hollywood, where everyone is pitching, rewriting, optimizing, “finding the story,” saying you’re born to it is a claim of legitimacy that can’t be audited. It shuts down arguments about craft because it reframes craft as mere technique: useful, maybe, but secondary to the primal thing. Milius is defending the gut-level narrative muscle - the ability to make a room lean forward - over the polite credentials of screenwriting manuals and committee notes.
The subtext is also self-mythology. If storytelling is innate, then the storyteller is less a worker than a creature: a conduit for violence, honor, spectacle, fate. That aligns with Milius’s whole cinematic temperament, where characters aren’t “developed” so much as forged.
Context matters: late-20th-century American film culture prized the singular voice while simultaneously industrializing scripts into products. This quote reads like an auteur’s reflex against that system - romantic, intimidating, and strategically unprovable.
The intent is gatekeeping with purpose. In Hollywood, where everyone is pitching, rewriting, optimizing, “finding the story,” saying you’re born to it is a claim of legitimacy that can’t be audited. It shuts down arguments about craft because it reframes craft as mere technique: useful, maybe, but secondary to the primal thing. Milius is defending the gut-level narrative muscle - the ability to make a room lean forward - over the polite credentials of screenwriting manuals and committee notes.
The subtext is also self-mythology. If storytelling is innate, then the storyteller is less a worker than a creature: a conduit for violence, honor, spectacle, fate. That aligns with Milius’s whole cinematic temperament, where characters aren’t “developed” so much as forged.
Context matters: late-20th-century American film culture prized the singular voice while simultaneously industrializing scripts into products. This quote reads like an auteur’s reflex against that system - romantic, intimidating, and strategically unprovable.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|
More Quotes by John
Add to List

