"Noises have generally been thought of as indistinct, but this is not true"
About this Quote
The intent here is practical and insurgent: retrain perception so composition can start anywhere. Schaeffer’s era mattered. Postwar Europe was awash in new machines, new media, and new ways of capturing sound. Magnetic tape and radio studios didn’t just record music; they made sound itself editable. That technical shift becomes an aesthetic argument: if you can loop a footstep, reverse it, isolate its texture, then “noise” stops being the opposite of meaning and becomes raw material with its own vocabulary.
The subtext is a critique of cultural gatekeeping. Calling something noise often means “not for serious attention,” the same move used to marginalize unfamiliar music, urban soundscapes, or working-class environments. Schaeffer’s sentence is a quiet power grab for the ear: listen harder, and the world gets more articulate. The provocation isn’t that noise can be musical. It’s that our categories are lazy, and laziness has been passing for taste.
Quote Details
| Topic | Music |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Schaeffer, Pierre. (2026, January 16). Noises have generally been thought of as indistinct, but this is not true. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/noises-have-generally-been-thought-of-as-101450/
Chicago Style
Schaeffer, Pierre. "Noises have generally been thought of as indistinct, but this is not true." FixQuotes. January 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/noises-have-generally-been-thought-of-as-101450/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Noises have generally been thought of as indistinct, but this is not true." FixQuotes, 16 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/noises-have-generally-been-thought-of-as-101450/. Accessed 21 Feb. 2026.







