"Not many architects have the luxury to reject significant things"
About this Quote
The key word is “significant.” Koolhaas isn’t talking about turning down bad projects. He’s talking about the rare chance to refuse projects that will actually matter: landmark commissions, consequential urban plans, cultural institutions that rewrite a city’s self-image. Significance is scarce, and scarcity disciplines behavior. Most architects operate in an economy where one major opportunity can underwrite a decade of smaller work, a studio’s survival, or a professional reputation. Saying no isn’t a moral stance; it’s a financial and institutional gamble.
The subtext also carries Koolhaas’s long-running argument about architects’ entanglement with forces they pretend to stand outside of: capital, spectacle, state agendas. If the only people who can reject “significant things” are already insulated by fame, wealth, or tenure, then refusal becomes its own kind of branding - an aesthetic of ethics. Koolhaas’s provocation lands because it flips the usual hierarchy: the more “important” the project, the less freedom you may have. In a field obsessed with control, he’s reminding you who actually has it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Work |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite | Cite this Quote |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Koolhaas, Rem. (n.d.). Not many architects have the luxury to reject significant things. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/not-many-architects-have-the-luxury-to-reject-107509/
Chicago Style
Koolhaas, Rem. "Not many architects have the luxury to reject significant things." FixQuotes. Accessed February 3, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/not-many-architects-have-the-luxury-to-reject-107509/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Not many architects have the luxury to reject significant things." FixQuotes, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/not-many-architects-have-the-luxury-to-reject-107509/. Accessed 3 Feb. 2026.






