"Not only has this subject been long associated with the ideas of thinking men over the ages but its practical importance is attested to by the huge resources of men and material thrown into this type of work"
About this Quote
There’s a bureaucrat’s swagger buried in Hofstadter’s sentence: the quiet insistence that an idea becomes respectable not just because “thinking men” have pondered it, but because states, firms, and institutions have paid for it in bulk. He’s yoking prestige to pedigree and, more pointedly, to budget. The phrase “thinking men over the ages” does double duty. It flatters the reader by inviting them into a lineage of rational seriousness, while also narrowing who counts as an intellectual authority. It’s the old midcentury posture: expertise as a masculine inheritance, certified by history.
Then comes the real tell: “huge resources of men and material thrown into this type of work.” “Thrown” is a vivid verb for an economist - less careful allocation than mass mobilization. It carries the insinuation that the work is not merely interesting but strategically necessary, the kind of necessity you measure in manpower, labs, and procurement. That wording lands especially well in the twentieth-century context where “practical importance” often meant wartime research, industrial planning, or Cold War competition - arenas where funding decisions functioned as political endorsements of truth.
The subtext is a validation loop: if powerful actors invest heavily, the subject must matter; if it matters, it deserves further investment and deference. Hofstadter isn’t arguing on first principles so much as on institutional behavior. The line sells seriousness by pointing at the size of the machine behind it, converting scale into credibility, and credibility into permission to keep building.
Then comes the real tell: “huge resources of men and material thrown into this type of work.” “Thrown” is a vivid verb for an economist - less careful allocation than mass mobilization. It carries the insinuation that the work is not merely interesting but strategically necessary, the kind of necessity you measure in manpower, labs, and procurement. That wording lands especially well in the twentieth-century context where “practical importance” often meant wartime research, industrial planning, or Cold War competition - arenas where funding decisions functioned as political endorsements of truth.
The subtext is a validation loop: if powerful actors invest heavily, the subject must matter; if it matters, it deserves further investment and deference. Hofstadter isn’t arguing on first principles so much as on institutional behavior. The line sells seriousness by pointing at the size of the machine behind it, converting scale into credibility, and credibility into permission to keep building.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|
More Quotes by Robert
Add to List






