"Not that I believe you can have it all: I believe you can have it all, just not at the same time"
About this Quote
Cindy Crawford’s line lands because it refuses the two most exhausting stories women get sold: the fairy tale of effortless “having it all,” and the cynical backlash that says ambition itself is a lie. She threads the needle with a model’s precision: yes, the whole menu exists, but not as a single, perfectly plated course. The hinge phrase “just not at the same time” is doing all the work, shifting the fantasy from simultaneity to sequence.
The intent is pragmatic reassurance, delivered with a wink. Crawford isn’t offering permission to quit; she’s offering permission to triage. That matters coming from a supermodel whose career was built in an era when the public expected women to look timeless, stay relevant, and remain emotionally available while being professionally relentless. Her credibility is cultural, not academic: she’s lived inside an industry that monetizes the illusion of permanent readiness.
The subtext is a quiet critique of the “all” itself. “All” is usually defined by someone else: peak career, perfect body, perfect partner, perfect mother, perfect public image. By insisting on time as the constraint, she exposes “having it all” as a scheduling problem masquerading as a moral one. If you’re failing, it’s not because you lack discipline; it’s because the demand is structurally incoherent.
Contextually, it’s a quote that fits the post-90s professional woman’s reality: flexibility, trade-offs, and seasons. It doesn’t romanticize burnout. It dignifies choice, and it replaces guilt with a calendar.
The intent is pragmatic reassurance, delivered with a wink. Crawford isn’t offering permission to quit; she’s offering permission to triage. That matters coming from a supermodel whose career was built in an era when the public expected women to look timeless, stay relevant, and remain emotionally available while being professionally relentless. Her credibility is cultural, not academic: she’s lived inside an industry that monetizes the illusion of permanent readiness.
The subtext is a quiet critique of the “all” itself. “All” is usually defined by someone else: peak career, perfect body, perfect partner, perfect mother, perfect public image. By insisting on time as the constraint, she exposes “having it all” as a scheduling problem masquerading as a moral one. If you’re failing, it’s not because you lack discipline; it’s because the demand is structurally incoherent.
Contextually, it’s a quote that fits the post-90s professional woman’s reality: flexibility, trade-offs, and seasons. It doesn’t romanticize burnout. It dignifies choice, and it replaces guilt with a calendar.
Quote Details
| Topic | Work-Life Balance |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Cindy
Add to List




