"Nothing is less instructive than a machine"
About this Quote
The sentence sounds paradoxical because a machine is an embodiment of knowledge, yet teaching is not what it gives to those who serve it. Simone Weil learned this on the factory floor in the 1930s, where the pace of production turned the worker into an appendage of steel. Operation demands obedience to rhythm, not understanding of causes. The more perfect the mechanism, the more it hides the intelligible sequence of actions beneath smooth, automatic motion. What reaches the operator is only the command: keep up.
Weil prized attention as the soul’s deepest discipline, a patient, receptive gaze that grasps order through resistance. Nature, craft, and genuine tools offer that resistance; they push back, make reasons visible, and draw intelligence out. A machine, by contrast, concentrates reason in its design phase and then seals it away. The one who flips the switch or feeds the conveyor learns fatigue, timing, and fear of stoppage, not the why of things. Knowledge is centralized upstream; downstream there is only execution.
The line is also a moral judgment about modern work. When thought and action split, dignity withers. Training shrinks into rote compliance, and the worker’s experience does not accumulate into wisdom. Even breakdowns do not teach in a deep sense; they merely threaten punishment. Instruction returns only when one is allowed to inquire, repair, tinker, or redesign, when the veil is lifted and purposes are shared.
The insight extends to our digital world. The frictionless interface, the black-box algorithm, the button that delivers without revealing method, all pare away the occasions for understanding. Convenience grows as comprehension shrinks. Weil’s challenge is not anti-technology; it is a demand that tools be made transparent, that making and using be rejoined, and that work be structured so that causes are visible to those who bear the effects. Only then can machines cease to be mute idols and become companions in learning.
Weil prized attention as the soul’s deepest discipline, a patient, receptive gaze that grasps order through resistance. Nature, craft, and genuine tools offer that resistance; they push back, make reasons visible, and draw intelligence out. A machine, by contrast, concentrates reason in its design phase and then seals it away. The one who flips the switch or feeds the conveyor learns fatigue, timing, and fear of stoppage, not the why of things. Knowledge is centralized upstream; downstream there is only execution.
The line is also a moral judgment about modern work. When thought and action split, dignity withers. Training shrinks into rote compliance, and the worker’s experience does not accumulate into wisdom. Even breakdowns do not teach in a deep sense; they merely threaten punishment. Instruction returns only when one is allowed to inquire, repair, tinker, or redesign, when the veil is lifted and purposes are shared.
The insight extends to our digital world. The frictionless interface, the black-box algorithm, the button that delivers without revealing method, all pare away the occasions for understanding. Convenience grows as comprehension shrinks. Weil’s challenge is not anti-technology; it is a demand that tools be made transparent, that making and using be rejoined, and that work be structured so that causes are visible to those who bear the effects. Only then can machines cease to be mute idols and become companions in learning.
Quote Details
| Topic | Teaching |
|---|
More Quotes by Simone
Add to List





