"Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program"
About this Quote
Beneath the neat, almost bumper-sticker phrasing is a deeply strategic warning about how the state actually grows: not through grand ideological coups, but through “temporary” fixes that quietly become fixtures. Friedman’s line works because it weaponizes a contradiction. Governments sell new programs as emergency scaffolding, moral triage, pragmatic stopgaps. He insists the opposite is the rule: once a bureaucracy exists, it develops constituencies, budgets, career incentives, and political patrons who treat its survival as the real mission. “Temporary” becomes the anesthetic that gets the policy past public resistance.
The subtext is classic Friedman: skepticism not only of government competence, but of government reversibility. Markets can shrink, firms can fail, and consumers can switch. Programs, by contrast, gain a kind of institutional gravity. Even if the original crisis fades, the apparatus remains, rebranding itself, expanding eligibility, finding new justifications. The quote’s durability comes from how it maps onto basic political behavior: it’s easier to create benefits than to repeal them, easier to fund a line item than to be the politician who “cuts” it. Voters notice losses more than long-run fiscal drift.
Context matters: Friedman spent much of his public life contesting the midcentury expansion of the welfare and regulatory state, arguing that well-meant interventions often outlive their usefulness and outpace democratic scrutiny. The sentence is designed as a pressure point in that debate, a reminder that policy isn’t only about intentions at launch, but about the institutional lifecycle afterward.
The subtext is classic Friedman: skepticism not only of government competence, but of government reversibility. Markets can shrink, firms can fail, and consumers can switch. Programs, by contrast, gain a kind of institutional gravity. Even if the original crisis fades, the apparatus remains, rebranding itself, expanding eligibility, finding new justifications. The quote’s durability comes from how it maps onto basic political behavior: it’s easier to create benefits than to repeal them, easier to fund a line item than to be the politician who “cuts” it. Voters notice losses more than long-run fiscal drift.
Context matters: Friedman spent much of his public life contesting the midcentury expansion of the welfare and regulatory state, arguing that well-meant interventions often outlive their usefulness and outpace democratic scrutiny. The sentence is designed as a pressure point in that debate, a reminder that policy isn’t only about intentions at launch, but about the institutional lifecycle afterward.
Quote Details
| Topic | Witty One-Liners |
|---|
More Quotes by Milton
Add to List







