"Nothing was a style first. Everything started as an idea. A guy did something with an idea. Someone copied him. Some copied all of them and it became trendy and then it became a style"
About this Quote
Laswell’s line cuts through the mystique that the culture industry loves to sell: “style” isn’t born on a runway or in a branding deck, it’s the exhaust trail of experimentation. Coming from a musician whose career is basically a long argument for cross-pollination - jazz, dub, funk, ambient, world traditions, studio-as-instrument - it reads like a defense of the messy first draft against the polished final product.
The intent is practical, almost producer-minded. He’s mapping a pipeline: idea -> act -> imitation -> aggregation -> trend -> “style.” That sequence demotes style from sacred identity to social logistics. In other words, what we treat as an aesthetic essence is often just a record of who got copied at scale. The subtext is a quiet jab at gatekeeping: if style is downstream from copying, then the people who police “authenticity” are often guarding a moving target they didn’t invent.
There’s also an implicit ethics here. Laswell isn’t condemning copying; he’s acknowledging it as the engine. What matters is the first leap - someone doing something that doesn’t yet have a name - and then what happens when the leap gets packaged. Trendiness becomes a kind of laundering process: the original risk is diluted, the rough edges are sanded, and suddenly the culture calls it a “style” like it arrived fully formed.
Read in the context of music scenes, it’s a warning and a permission slip. Don’t worship style. Make the move first, accept the echoes, and remember that tomorrow’s “signature sound” is usually yesterday’s weird idea, repeated until it felt inevitable.
The intent is practical, almost producer-minded. He’s mapping a pipeline: idea -> act -> imitation -> aggregation -> trend -> “style.” That sequence demotes style from sacred identity to social logistics. In other words, what we treat as an aesthetic essence is often just a record of who got copied at scale. The subtext is a quiet jab at gatekeeping: if style is downstream from copying, then the people who police “authenticity” are often guarding a moving target they didn’t invent.
There’s also an implicit ethics here. Laswell isn’t condemning copying; he’s acknowledging it as the engine. What matters is the first leap - someone doing something that doesn’t yet have a name - and then what happens when the leap gets packaged. Trendiness becomes a kind of laundering process: the original risk is diluted, the rough edges are sanded, and suddenly the culture calls it a “style” like it arrived fully formed.
Read in the context of music scenes, it’s a warning and a permission slip. Don’t worship style. Make the move first, accept the echoes, and remember that tomorrow’s “signature sound” is usually yesterday’s weird idea, repeated until it felt inevitable.
Quote Details
| Topic | Music |
|---|
More Quotes by Bill
Add to List




