"Novel technologies and ideas that impinge on human biology and their perceived impact on human values have renewed strains in the relationship between science and society"
About this Quote
Anxiety is the hidden engine in Berg's sentence, and he frames it with a scientist's restraint. "Novel technologies and ideas" is deliberately broad, a catchall that quietly gestures toward the late-20th-century breakthroughs he lived through: recombinant DNA, gene splicing, early bioengineering, the first real sense that humans could edit life rather than just study it. Berg helped invent that world, then helped warn it about itself.
The key move is "impinge on human biology" paired with "perceived impact on human values". Biology is the hard substrate; values are the soft tissue. Berg is naming the flashpoint where technical capability starts to feel like moral trespass. "Impinge" is doing a lot of work: it suggests intrusion, not progress, hinting that certain discoveries don't merely add knowledge, they trespass into zones people experience as identity, dignity, even sacredness.
"Perceived" is the protective word. He isn't conceding that science necessarily corrodes values; he's acknowledging that public reaction is often driven by interpretation, fear, and symbolism as much as by risk assessments. That's subtext from someone who understood that legitimacy is not granted by peer review alone.
The phrase "renewed strains" also matters. This isn't a new culture war; it's a recurring tension that flares whenever science rewrites the boundary between what is and what ought to be. Berg's context includes the Asilomar Conference and the self-imposed pauses scientists advocated - an argument that scientific freedom survives only when it makes room for democratic unease, not when it dismisses it.
The key move is "impinge on human biology" paired with "perceived impact on human values". Biology is the hard substrate; values are the soft tissue. Berg is naming the flashpoint where technical capability starts to feel like moral trespass. "Impinge" is doing a lot of work: it suggests intrusion, not progress, hinting that certain discoveries don't merely add knowledge, they trespass into zones people experience as identity, dignity, even sacredness.
"Perceived" is the protective word. He isn't conceding that science necessarily corrodes values; he's acknowledging that public reaction is often driven by interpretation, fear, and symbolism as much as by risk assessments. That's subtext from someone who understood that legitimacy is not granted by peer review alone.
The phrase "renewed strains" also matters. This isn't a new culture war; it's a recurring tension that flares whenever science rewrites the boundary between what is and what ought to be. Berg's context includes the Asilomar Conference and the self-imposed pauses scientists advocated - an argument that scientific freedom survives only when it makes room for democratic unease, not when it dismisses it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|
More Quotes by Paul
Add to List



