"Now, the United Nations is an organization that I believe was founded with good intentions. As a matter of fact, a prominent Tennessean named Cordell Hull was very involved with it"
About this Quote
Wamp is doing the politician’s version of a soft landing: he nods respectfully at the United Nations, then quietly reclaims the argument for a more skeptical audience. “Founded with good intentions” is the key phrase. It grants moral credit without endorsing performance, a setup that lets him criticize the institution later while sounding reasonable, even statesmanlike. The line signals moderation, but it’s moderation with an escape hatch.
The Cordell Hull reference does double duty. First, it domesticates a global body by anchoring it in a hometown hero, turning the UN from an abstract, often-maligned international bureaucracy into something with Southern roots and American fingerprints. Hull, a Tennessean and a principal architect of postwar internationalism, becomes a kind of cultural permission slip: if you’re uneasy about the UN, you can still respect it because “our guy” helped build it. That’s not history for its own sake; it’s a rhetorical shield.
The subtext reads like a triangulation between constituencies: international cooperation isn’t dismissed outright (important for donors, moderates, and “serious” governance), but the emphasis on intentions rather than outcomes reassures voters who hear “UN” and think diluted sovereignty. It’s also a subtle claim of credibility. By invoking Hull, Wamp borrows gravitas and signals that his view isn’t reflexive anti-globalism; it’s grounded in American legacy. In a political climate where the UN often functions as a partisan shorthand, this is careful pre-bargaining: respect first, critique to follow.
The Cordell Hull reference does double duty. First, it domesticates a global body by anchoring it in a hometown hero, turning the UN from an abstract, often-maligned international bureaucracy into something with Southern roots and American fingerprints. Hull, a Tennessean and a principal architect of postwar internationalism, becomes a kind of cultural permission slip: if you’re uneasy about the UN, you can still respect it because “our guy” helped build it. That’s not history for its own sake; it’s a rhetorical shield.
The subtext reads like a triangulation between constituencies: international cooperation isn’t dismissed outright (important for donors, moderates, and “serious” governance), but the emphasis on intentions rather than outcomes reassures voters who hear “UN” and think diluted sovereignty. It’s also a subtle claim of credibility. By invoking Hull, Wamp borrows gravitas and signals that his view isn’t reflexive anti-globalism; it’s grounded in American legacy. In a political climate where the UN often functions as a partisan shorthand, this is careful pre-bargaining: respect first, critique to follow.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Zach
Add to List




