"Now, whenever you read any historical document, you always evaluate it in light of the historical context"
About this Quote
The line lands like a commonsense rule, but its real force is defensive. McDowell, an evangelical writer best known for arguing that Christian claims can survive courtroom-style scrutiny, isn’t just offering a tidy research tip. He’s laying down a preemptive frame: if you’re going to judge a text, you don’t get to use today’s sensibilities as the measuring stick. “Historical context” becomes both a methodological principle and a rhetorical shield.
The wording matters. “Whenever” and “always” are totalizing; they turn interpretation into an ethic, almost a moral obligation. That absolutism quietly polices the reader: any criticism that feels “anachronistic” can be dismissed as intellectually sloppy before it’s even heard. It’s a move that plays well in faith-and-apologetics spaces where the stakes are high and the audience is wary of secular criticism. By insisting on context, McDowell can argue that miracles, prophecy, or ancient moral codes should be weighed within the expectations, genres, and social conditions of their time rather than the default skepticism of the present.
The subtext is a wager about authority. If context is the gatekeeper, then institutions and interpreters who claim expertise in that context gain leverage. It’s also a subtle invitation to sympathy: treat the past as a foreign country with its own norms, not a defendant in a modern trial. As guidance for reading history, it’s unobjectionable. As a cultural tactic, it’s a way of shifting the burden of proof from the text to the critic: prove you’ve earned the right to judge.
The wording matters. “Whenever” and “always” are totalizing; they turn interpretation into an ethic, almost a moral obligation. That absolutism quietly polices the reader: any criticism that feels “anachronistic” can be dismissed as intellectually sloppy before it’s even heard. It’s a move that plays well in faith-and-apologetics spaces where the stakes are high and the audience is wary of secular criticism. By insisting on context, McDowell can argue that miracles, prophecy, or ancient moral codes should be weighed within the expectations, genres, and social conditions of their time rather than the default skepticism of the present.
The subtext is a wager about authority. If context is the gatekeeper, then institutions and interpreters who claim expertise in that context gain leverage. It’s also a subtle invitation to sympathy: treat the past as a foreign country with its own norms, not a defendant in a modern trial. As guidance for reading history, it’s unobjectionable. As a cultural tactic, it’s a way of shifting the burden of proof from the text to the critic: prove you’ve earned the right to judge.
Quote Details
| Topic | Knowledge |
|---|
More Quotes by Josh
Add to List
