"Nowhere has specialization penetrated so deeply into the building professions as North America"
About this Quote
Specialization, Erickson implies, isn’t just a workflow in North American architecture; it’s an ideology. The line lands as a warning disguised as an observation: the building professions have become so atomized that the act of making a coherent place risks getting lost between silos. “Penetrated so deeply” is tellingly bodily language, suggesting an invasive force rather than a neutral refinement. He’s not praising expertise; he’s diagnosing a culture that treats buildings like deliverables assembled from separately optimized parts.
The specific intent reads as professional critique. In North America’s postwar boom, architecture increasingly sat inside a sprawling apparatus of consultants, codes, liability management, and procurement systems that reward narrow accountability over broad authorship. Erickson, whose work depended on strong spatial and civic ideas, is implicitly arguing that the architect’s traditional role as integrator is being eroded by a system that prefers the safe, the measurable, the insurable.
Subtext: specialization becomes a convenient alibi. If every discipline owns a fragment, no one owns the whole. The building may meet performance targets yet fail as culture: dead public space, value-engineered materiality, landscapes treated as afterthoughts. Erickson’s jab is also regional. North America’s market-driven development and litigation fears encourage compartmentalization, while many European traditions (at least in his era) retained stronger continuity between design intent, craft, and urban responsibility.
The quote works because it frames a bureaucratic condition as a moral one. “Building professions” isn’t just architects; it’s the entire ecology that shapes everyday life. Erickson is asking who, in this specialized machine, is still accountable for meaning.
The specific intent reads as professional critique. In North America’s postwar boom, architecture increasingly sat inside a sprawling apparatus of consultants, codes, liability management, and procurement systems that reward narrow accountability over broad authorship. Erickson, whose work depended on strong spatial and civic ideas, is implicitly arguing that the architect’s traditional role as integrator is being eroded by a system that prefers the safe, the measurable, the insurable.
Subtext: specialization becomes a convenient alibi. If every discipline owns a fragment, no one owns the whole. The building may meet performance targets yet fail as culture: dead public space, value-engineered materiality, landscapes treated as afterthoughts. Erickson’s jab is also regional. North America’s market-driven development and litigation fears encourage compartmentalization, while many European traditions (at least in his era) retained stronger continuity between design intent, craft, and urban responsibility.
The quote works because it frames a bureaucratic condition as a moral one. “Building professions” isn’t just architects; it’s the entire ecology that shapes everyday life. Erickson is asking who, in this specialized machine, is still accountable for meaning.
Quote Details
| Topic | Engineer |
|---|
More Quotes by Arthur
Add to List
