"Nuclear weapons offer us nothing but a balance of terror, and a balance of terror is still terror"
About this Quote
The intent is less pacifist sentimentality than epistemic clarity. As a scientist, Wald is effectively saying: if your system’s equilibrium condition is terror, equilibrium doesn’t redeem it. Deterrence theory sells itself as stability, a rational marketplace of threats; Wald highlights the psychological and political cost that never makes it into the tidy models. Even when the weapons aren’t fired, they reorder public life: perpetual contingency planning, normalized secrecy, the quiet acceptance that cities are hostages to credible annihilation.
The subtext is an indictment of moral outsourcing. “Offer us nothing” rejects the idea that nuclear arsenals buy peace; they merely postpone catastrophe while embedding it into everyday governance. Coming from a prominent biologist and public critic of nuclear policy, it also signals impatience with technocratic authority: the same culture that built the bomb cannot be trusted to define what counts as “security.” Wald’s rhetoric does what deterrence can’t: it makes the abstraction feel obscene.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Wald, George. (2026, January 17). Nuclear weapons offer us nothing but a balance of terror, and a balance of terror is still terror. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/nuclear-weapons-offer-us-nothing-but-a-balance-of-60116/
Chicago Style
Wald, George. "Nuclear weapons offer us nothing but a balance of terror, and a balance of terror is still terror." FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/nuclear-weapons-offer-us-nothing-but-a-balance-of-60116/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Nuclear weapons offer us nothing but a balance of terror, and a balance of terror is still terror." FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/nuclear-weapons-offer-us-nothing-but-a-balance-of-60116/. Accessed 4 Feb. 2026.


