"Obsessions turn people off"
About this Quote
“Obsessions turn people off” lands like a piece of political advice masquerading as a universal truth. Coming from Grover Norquist, a figure synonymous with hardline anti-tax discipline, it reads less like a warning against extremism in general and more like a tactical memo about optics. The phrasing is blunt, almost consumer-oriented: politics as a market, voters as customers, “off” as the click away.
The intent is to caution against letting any single issue become a public personality. Norquist built power by making tax opposition a governing identity for Republicans, yet he also understood the backlash cycle: when a movement’s fixation hardens into obsession, it stops looking principled and starts looking weird. In modern political culture, “weird” is fatal. It signals rigidity, social alienation, and an inability to govern beyond the slogan.
The subtext is more slippery. Norquist isn’t condemning obsessive politics as morally wrong; he’s flagging it as strategically counterproductive. There’s an implied distinction between discipline and obsession: discipline is admirable, obsession is embarrassing. That distinction matters to an operator who depends on enforcing party unity without making the enforcement itself the story.
Context sharpens the irony. Norquist’s public brand has often been described by critics as obsessional, especially his single-minded focus on taxes and his pledge politics. The line can be read as self-aware calibration: keep the base energized, but don’t let the fixation read as mania to everyone else. It’s a reminder that in politics, the boundary between conviction and compulsion isn’t ethical, it’s aesthetic.
The intent is to caution against letting any single issue become a public personality. Norquist built power by making tax opposition a governing identity for Republicans, yet he also understood the backlash cycle: when a movement’s fixation hardens into obsession, it stops looking principled and starts looking weird. In modern political culture, “weird” is fatal. It signals rigidity, social alienation, and an inability to govern beyond the slogan.
The subtext is more slippery. Norquist isn’t condemning obsessive politics as morally wrong; he’s flagging it as strategically counterproductive. There’s an implied distinction between discipline and obsession: discipline is admirable, obsession is embarrassing. That distinction matters to an operator who depends on enforcing party unity without making the enforcement itself the story.
Context sharpens the irony. Norquist’s public brand has often been described by critics as obsessional, especially his single-minded focus on taxes and his pledge politics. The line can be read as self-aware calibration: keep the base energized, but don’t let the fixation read as mania to everyone else. It’s a reminder that in politics, the boundary between conviction and compulsion isn’t ethical, it’s aesthetic.
Quote Details
| Topic | Relationship |
|---|
More Quotes by Grover
Add to List







