"Old age is far more than white hair, wrinkles, the feeling that it is too late and the game finished, that the stage belongs to the rising generations. The true evil is not the weakening of the body, but the indifference of the soul"
About this Quote
Maurois treats old age less as a biological condition than as a moral and imaginative failure. The opening move is deliberately conventional: the expected inventory of decline (white hair, wrinkles, “too late,” “the game finished”) reads like the stock footage of aging. That list isn’t there to persuade; it’s there to clear the stage. By stacking the clichés, he exposes how quickly society reduces elders to props in someone else’s story, “the rising generations” inheriting not just power but the spotlight. The phrase “the stage belongs” slips in a quiet accusation: we don’t merely age, we’re culturally written out.
Then Maurois pivots to what he calls “the true evil,” and the word choice matters. “Evil” frames indifference not as a sad byproduct of time but as an ethical collapse. His real fear isn’t frailty; it’s surrendering curiosity, appetite, judgment - the inner life that makes a person more than their usefulness. “Indifference of the soul” is pointedly unromantic. It suggests numbness, disengagement, a refusal to care that can arrive at twenty-five as easily as seventy-five, but becomes socially excusable in old age.
The subtext carries a corrective to modern worship of youth: the body will betray you; that’s ordinary. What’s catastrophic is collaborating with the narrative that your desires and convictions should shrink. Maurois, writing across two world wars and rapid social change, is defending a form of continuity - not clinging to relevance, but insisting that vitality is a stance, not an age bracket.
Then Maurois pivots to what he calls “the true evil,” and the word choice matters. “Evil” frames indifference not as a sad byproduct of time but as an ethical collapse. His real fear isn’t frailty; it’s surrendering curiosity, appetite, judgment - the inner life that makes a person more than their usefulness. “Indifference of the soul” is pointedly unromantic. It suggests numbness, disengagement, a refusal to care that can arrive at twenty-five as easily as seventy-five, but becomes socially excusable in old age.
The subtext carries a corrective to modern worship of youth: the body will betray you; that’s ordinary. What’s catastrophic is collaborating with the narrative that your desires and convictions should shrink. Maurois, writing across two world wars and rapid social change, is defending a form of continuity - not clinging to relevance, but insisting that vitality is a stance, not an age bracket.
Quote Details
| Topic | Aging |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Andre
Add to List









