"On March 11, 1985, Mikhail Gorbachev became leader of the Soviet Union, and within a few weeks the full-scale reformation he attempted to carry out both inside his country and in its cold war relations with the West, particularly the United States, began to unfold"
About this Quote
March 11, 1985 gets framed here as a hinge in history, not because one man took an oath, but because the Soviet system finally produced a leader willing to treat stagnation as an emergency. Stephen Cohen’s phrasing is doing quiet argumentative work. “Within a few weeks” compresses the timeline to rebut the common myth that perestroika and glasnost were slow-blooming accidents or purely reactive concessions to Western pressure. Cohen wants you to see intention and momentum: reform wasn’t a mood; it was an agenda that asserted itself almost immediately.
The sentence also stitches together two arenas that are often analyzed separately: domestic transformation and Cold War diplomacy. By pairing “inside his country” with “relations with the West,” Cohen signals that the USSR’s external posture was inseparable from its internal decay. Arms races, secrecy, bureaucratic sclerosis, and economic malaise weren’t parallel stories; they were the same crisis seen from different angles. That’s the subtext: you cannot “fix” the Soviet Union without also loosening its grip on confrontation, and you cannot de-escalate abroad without confronting the political machinery at home.
Calling it “full-scale reformation” is deliberate, slightly loaded language from an educator-historian who spent years pushing against simplistic victory narratives. It positions Gorbachev less as the man who “lost” the Cold War and more as a rare actor trying to modernize an unmodernizable empire. “Attempted” keeps the admiration in check, acknowledging the tragic arc: intent is not outcome, and reform can be both morally serious and structurally doomed.
The sentence also stitches together two arenas that are often analyzed separately: domestic transformation and Cold War diplomacy. By pairing “inside his country” with “relations with the West,” Cohen signals that the USSR’s external posture was inseparable from its internal decay. Arms races, secrecy, bureaucratic sclerosis, and economic malaise weren’t parallel stories; they were the same crisis seen from different angles. That’s the subtext: you cannot “fix” the Soviet Union without also loosening its grip on confrontation, and you cannot de-escalate abroad without confronting the political machinery at home.
Calling it “full-scale reformation” is deliberate, slightly loaded language from an educator-historian who spent years pushing against simplistic victory narratives. It positions Gorbachev less as the man who “lost” the Cold War and more as a rare actor trying to modernize an unmodernizable empire. “Attempted” keeps the admiration in check, acknowledging the tragic arc: intent is not outcome, and reform can be both morally serious and structurally doomed.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|
More Quotes by Stephen
Add to List
