"Once a person has killed other people on behalf of an ideology, he becomes rather devoted to it"
About this Quote
Violence doesn’t just enforce ideology; it invests the believer in it. McCarthy’s line cuts to a grim psychological truth: once someone has crossed the moral Rubicon of killing “on behalf of” an idea, walking back isn’t a matter of changing one’s mind. It’s a matter of undoing a life-altering ledger entry. The sentence is engineered to sound almost clinical - “rather devoted” is an icy understatement - which is exactly the point. It frames fanaticism less as hot-blooded passion than as post-hoc accounting.
The intent is warning, not consolation. McCarthy isn’t romanticizing martyrdom or revolutionary purity; he’s describing the trapdoor beneath political violence. After blood is spilled, ideology becomes a defense mechanism. If the cause was wrong, then the killer isn’t just mistaken - he’s culpable. Devotion, here, is a form of self-preservation: to doubt the creed would be to admit the killings were pointless or criminal. So the mind tightens its grip on the story that made the act “necessary.”
Subtextually, the quote is also an indictment of leaders who outsource brutality to foot soldiers. Those who order, encourage, or rhetorically license violence create followers who can’t easily demobilize, because the ideology has been fused to their identity and guilt. The context - a politician speaking - matters: it’s a reminder that political movements don’t simply end when the slogans fade. Once they’ve required killing, they manufacture loyalists with a terrifying staying power.
The intent is warning, not consolation. McCarthy isn’t romanticizing martyrdom or revolutionary purity; he’s describing the trapdoor beneath political violence. After blood is spilled, ideology becomes a defense mechanism. If the cause was wrong, then the killer isn’t just mistaken - he’s culpable. Devotion, here, is a form of self-preservation: to doubt the creed would be to admit the killings were pointless or criminal. So the mind tightens its grip on the story that made the act “necessary.”
Subtextually, the quote is also an indictment of leaders who outsource brutality to foot soldiers. Those who order, encourage, or rhetorically license violence create followers who can’t easily demobilize, because the ideology has been fused to their identity and guilt. The context - a politician speaking - matters: it’s a reminder that political movements don’t simply end when the slogans fade. Once they’ve required killing, they manufacture loyalists with a terrifying staying power.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by John
Add to List











