"Once a profound truth has been seen, it cannot be 'unseen'. There's no 'going back' to the person you were. Even if such a possibility did exist... why would you want to?"
About this Quote
Sim’s line lands like a dare disguised as self-help: enlightenment isn’t a gentle upgrade, it’s an irreversible demolition. The hook is the verb “unseen,” a casual coinage that smuggles in a hard claim about consciousness: once you recognize a pattern - in politics, relationships, art, your own self-deceptions - you lose the comfort of plausible ignorance. That’s not mystical; it’s psychological. Knowledge rearranges the furniture. You can still walk into the same room, but you’ll trip over what you now notice.
The subtext is where Sim’s cartoonist instincts show. He frames “profound truth” like a panel reveal: the moment after the twist when the reader realizes the story they were following has been reauthored. Comics thrive on that snap of recontextualization, and so does this quote. It flatters the reader’s capacity for insight while warning them about the cost: alienation from your former identity, and from people still living in the old narrative.
Then the kicker: “Even if such a possibility did exist... why would you want to?” That rhetorical question isn’t a comfort; it’s a provocation. It assumes growth is preferable to innocence, even if growth makes you lonelier, angrier, or harder to entertain. Coming from a creator known for long-form, ideologically thorny work, it reads like both manifesto and self-justification: don’t ask the artist to return to earlier, safer versions of himself. The point isn’t that change is inevitable; it’s that retreat is a kind of betrayal.
The subtext is where Sim’s cartoonist instincts show. He frames “profound truth” like a panel reveal: the moment after the twist when the reader realizes the story they were following has been reauthored. Comics thrive on that snap of recontextualization, and so does this quote. It flatters the reader’s capacity for insight while warning them about the cost: alienation from your former identity, and from people still living in the old narrative.
Then the kicker: “Even if such a possibility did exist... why would you want to?” That rhetorical question isn’t a comfort; it’s a provocation. It assumes growth is preferable to innocence, even if growth makes you lonelier, angrier, or harder to entertain. Coming from a creator known for long-form, ideologically thorny work, it reads like both manifesto and self-justification: don’t ask the artist to return to earlier, safer versions of himself. The point isn’t that change is inevitable; it’s that retreat is a kind of betrayal.
Quote Details
| Topic | Embrace Change |
|---|
More Quotes by Dave
Add to List






