"One either has to believe in a God who's terribly prejudiced, or disbelieve the teachings of such exclusionary theologies. Religions have taught us that 'we are better than they.'"
About this Quote
Walsch lobs a polite grenade into the sanctuary: if your God reliably ends up endorsing your tribe, your politics, your gender hierarchy, your nation, your “chosen” status, then you’re not describing the divine so much as laundering prejudice through heaven. The line is built as a forced-choice trap, and that’s the point. He corners the reader into admitting an uncomfortable possibility: either God is morally compromised, or the theology claiming exclusive access to God is.
The subtext isn’t just interfaith tolerance; it’s a diagnosis of how group identity works. “We are better than they” is less doctrine than social technology, a simple algorithm for cohesion: draw a border, attach cosmic consequences, and suddenly belonging feels like righteousness. Walsch’s phrasing “terribly prejudiced” is deliberately blunt, almost conversational, because he’s not arguing like a theologian. He’s arguing like someone who’s watched religion function as a badge, not a practice.
Context matters here. Walsch’s wider work (notably the 1990s Conversations with God books) rides a spiritual-but-skeptical wave that distrusts institutions while still craving transcendence. This quote channels post-Cold War, post-culture-war fatigue: a sense that the fiercest certainties are often just fear dressed up as faith. By framing exclusion as “teachings,” he also points a finger at human intermediaries - clergy, texts, traditions - without fully discarding the possibility of God. It’s a strategic separation: salvage the sacred, indict the gatekeepers.
The subtext isn’t just interfaith tolerance; it’s a diagnosis of how group identity works. “We are better than they” is less doctrine than social technology, a simple algorithm for cohesion: draw a border, attach cosmic consequences, and suddenly belonging feels like righteousness. Walsch’s phrasing “terribly prejudiced” is deliberately blunt, almost conversational, because he’s not arguing like a theologian. He’s arguing like someone who’s watched religion function as a badge, not a practice.
Context matters here. Walsch’s wider work (notably the 1990s Conversations with God books) rides a spiritual-but-skeptical wave that distrusts institutions while still craving transcendence. This quote channels post-Cold War, post-culture-war fatigue: a sense that the fiercest certainties are often just fear dressed up as faith. By framing exclusion as “teachings,” he also points a finger at human intermediaries - clergy, texts, traditions - without fully discarding the possibility of God. It’s a strategic separation: salvage the sacred, indict the gatekeepers.
Quote Details
| Topic | God |
|---|
More Quotes by Neale
Add to List






