"One gets tired of the role critics are supposed to have in this culture: It's like being the piano player in a whorehouse; you don't have any control over the action going on upstairs"
About this Quote
Hughes lands the insult with the precision of a man who’s spent decades watching culture treat criticism as both entertainment and inconvenience. The “piano player in a whorehouse” isn’t just a cheap shock image; it’s a job description: keep the atmosphere lively, provide a veneer of sophistication, and don’t ask questions about what’s actually being sold. The critic, in this framing, is paid to score the scene, not to change it.
The genius of the metaphor is its architecture. There’s a literal separation of floors: critics operate in the public parlor, while the real transactions happen “upstairs,” out of reach, driven by money, power, celebrity, and institutional self-interest. Hughes is mocking the cultural fantasy that critics steer taste. What they often do is narrate it after the fact, translating a market outcome into a story that sounds like judgment.
Subtext: frustration with the shrinking authority of expertise in late-20th-century media culture, where publicity can overwhelm evaluation and where gatekeepers quietly become service workers. The critic’s “role” is supposedly to arbitrate standards, but the system wants him as ambiance - a tasteful soundtrack that reassures readers they’re consuming culture, not just product.
Context matters: Hughes wrote during the rise of blockbuster exhibitions, brand-name artists, and the increasingly symbiotic loop between art institutions, collectors, and press. His cynicism isn’t contempt for art so much as contempt for the machinery around it. The joke hurts because it’s true: critics can describe the upstairs, even warn you about it, but they’re rarely invited to hold the keys.
The genius of the metaphor is its architecture. There’s a literal separation of floors: critics operate in the public parlor, while the real transactions happen “upstairs,” out of reach, driven by money, power, celebrity, and institutional self-interest. Hughes is mocking the cultural fantasy that critics steer taste. What they often do is narrate it after the fact, translating a market outcome into a story that sounds like judgment.
Subtext: frustration with the shrinking authority of expertise in late-20th-century media culture, where publicity can overwhelm evaluation and where gatekeepers quietly become service workers. The critic’s “role” is supposedly to arbitrate standards, but the system wants him as ambiance - a tasteful soundtrack that reassures readers they’re consuming culture, not just product.
Context matters: Hughes wrote during the rise of blockbuster exhibitions, brand-name artists, and the increasingly symbiotic loop between art institutions, collectors, and press. His cynicism isn’t contempt for art so much as contempt for the machinery around it. The joke hurts because it’s true: critics can describe the upstairs, even warn you about it, but they’re rarely invited to hold the keys.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Robert
Add to List




