"One is sorry one could not have taken both branches of the road. But we were not allotted multiple selves"
About this Quote
The intent is less consolation than correction. Vidal is impatient with the culture’s sentimental loopholes, the way we narrate our lives as if we can keep every door ajar and still call it commitment. He frames the longing to “take both branches” as understandable, then immediately refuses to dignify it as plausible. The subtext is moral as much as metaphysical: every decision isn’t just a preference, it’s a self you authorize and a self you abandon. To pretend otherwise is to dodge responsibility while clinging to the dopamine of imagined options.
Context matters because Vidal’s career was built on showing how public personas, sexual identities, and political loyalties are performed - and policed. In a country that sells freedom as infinite choice, his line insists on finitude: you have one life, one body, one reputational ledger. The sting is that it’s also a kind of mercy. If you’re not “allotted” multiple selves, you can stop auditioning for the lives you didn’t choose and face the one you’re actually writing.
Quote Details
| Topic | Free Will & Fate |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Vidal, Gore. (2026, January 17). One is sorry one could not have taken both branches of the road. But we were not allotted multiple selves. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/one-is-sorry-one-could-not-have-taken-both-66481/
Chicago Style
Vidal, Gore. "One is sorry one could not have taken both branches of the road. But we were not allotted multiple selves." FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/one-is-sorry-one-could-not-have-taken-both-66481/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"One is sorry one could not have taken both branches of the road. But we were not allotted multiple selves." FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/one-is-sorry-one-could-not-have-taken-both-66481/. Accessed 13 Feb. 2026.





