"One looks back with appreciation to the brilliant teachers, but with gratitude to those who touched our human feelings. The curriculum is so much necessary raw material, but warmth is the vital element for the growing plant and for the soul of the child"
About this Quote
Jung’s line quietly demotes “brilliant teachers” from heroes to technicians. Admiration is polite; gratitude is intimate. That contrast is the engine of the quote: intellect can impress, but only warmth reorganizes a child from the inside. As a psychologist who built a career around the hidden life of feelings, Jung is smuggling a clinical claim into a nostalgic register: learning isn’t primarily a transfer of information, it’s a relationship that regulates the nervous system. The teacher’s tone, attention, and steadiness become part of the student’s internal world.
The plant metaphor is doing more than softening the message. “Curriculum” becomes raw material, inert stuff that doesn’t assemble itself into meaning. “Warmth” becomes the condition that makes growth possible at all. Jung isn’t anti-knowledge; he’s anti the fantasy that knowledge is self-sufficient. Subtext: education systems love what can be standardized (syllabi, scores, credentials) because it’s legible to bureaucracy, but the decisive factor is often illegible and therefore undervalued.
Context matters: Jung came of age in an era enthralled by rational mastery, industrial efficiency, and the authority of institutions. His broader work pushes back, insisting the psyche is shaped by emotion, symbol, attachment, and the need to be seen. Read that way, the quote is also an ethical warning. If schools treat children as vessels for “material,” they produce compliant test-takers who may still be starved of the very element that makes a self durable: human recognition.
The plant metaphor is doing more than softening the message. “Curriculum” becomes raw material, inert stuff that doesn’t assemble itself into meaning. “Warmth” becomes the condition that makes growth possible at all. Jung isn’t anti-knowledge; he’s anti the fantasy that knowledge is self-sufficient. Subtext: education systems love what can be standardized (syllabi, scores, credentials) because it’s legible to bureaucracy, but the decisive factor is often illegible and therefore undervalued.
Context matters: Jung came of age in an era enthralled by rational mastery, industrial efficiency, and the authority of institutions. His broader work pushes back, insisting the psyche is shaped by emotion, symbol, attachment, and the need to be seen. Read that way, the quote is also an ethical warning. If schools treat children as vessels for “material,” they produce compliant test-takers who may still be starved of the very element that makes a self durable: human recognition.
Quote Details
| Topic | Teacher Appreciation |
|---|
More Quotes by Carl
Add to List


