"One machine can do the work of fifty ordinary men. No machine can do the work of one extraordinary man"
About this Quote
Industrial-age bravado hides in Hubbard's neat arithmetic: fifty ordinary men reduced to a single unit of steel and gears, then the punchline - the extraordinary man as an irreplaceable glitch in the machine's logic. The line works because it flatters ambition while conceding the era's anxiety. At the turn of the 20th century, mechanization was devouring crafts, compressing skilled labor into repeatable motions, and teaching workers to think of themselves as interchangeable parts. Hubbard, a Roycroft-era booster of Arts and Crafts individualism, answers that dread with a myth powerful enough to compete with the factory: genius.
The subtext isn't just "be great". It's "don't let the system define you". By conceding the machine's superiority over the ordinary, he makes the challenge sharper: mediocrity will be automated. The extraordinary, in Hubbard's telling, is not raw talent alone but judgment, taste, initiative - the human qualities that don't scale cleanly. It's a managerial and moral claim dressed up as a compliment: societies can mass-produce output, but they can't mass-produce leadership.
There's also a sly bit of class politics. "Ordinary men" are treated as a bulk commodity, while the "extraordinary man" is cast as the rare asset - inventor, entrepreneur, foreman, artist - the person who turns machinery into meaning and profit. In that sense, the quote both resists and harmonizes with industrial capitalism: it criticizes dehumanizing efficiency while reinforcing the cult of exceptional individuals who supposedly justify the hierarchy. It's aspiration with a blade in it: become singular, or be replaced.
The subtext isn't just "be great". It's "don't let the system define you". By conceding the machine's superiority over the ordinary, he makes the challenge sharper: mediocrity will be automated. The extraordinary, in Hubbard's telling, is not raw talent alone but judgment, taste, initiative - the human qualities that don't scale cleanly. It's a managerial and moral claim dressed up as a compliment: societies can mass-produce output, but they can't mass-produce leadership.
There's also a sly bit of class politics. "Ordinary men" are treated as a bulk commodity, while the "extraordinary man" is cast as the rare asset - inventor, entrepreneur, foreman, artist - the person who turns machinery into meaning and profit. In that sense, the quote both resists and harmonizes with industrial capitalism: it criticizes dehumanizing efficiency while reinforcing the cult of exceptional individuals who supposedly justify the hierarchy. It's aspiration with a blade in it: become singular, or be replaced.
Quote Details
| Topic | Motivational |
|---|---|
| Source | Unverified source: The Philistine (Apr 1905): Aphorism on machines vs men (Elbert Hubbard, 1905)
Evidence: Page 160 (Vol. 20, No. 5, April 1905). The earliest specific primary-source citation I could verify is an aphorism printed in Elbert Hubbard’s own periodical, The Philistine, April 1905 (Vol. 20, No. 5), p. 160. The quote is also later reprinted in Hubbard’s book A Thousand and One Epigrams (1911... Other candidates (2) Elbert Hubbard (Elbert Hubbard) compilation98.0% of it alive p 74 one machine can do the work of fifty ordinary men no machine can do the work of one extraordinary ma... Problem Solving with Computers (Greg W. Scragg, 1997) compilation95.0% ... One machine can do the work of fifty ordinary men . No machine can do the work of one extraordinary man . -ELBERT... |
More Quotes by Elbert
Add to List








