"One man's "magic" is another man's engineering. "Supernatural" is a null word"
About this Quote
Robert A. Heinlein pairs wonder with wiring diagrams. What looks like sorcery from one vantage point is, from another, a system of causes, constraints, and clever design. The difference is not in the phenomenon but in the observer's toolkit. Knowledge, training, and familiarity turn shimmering mystery into repeatable method; ignorance does the reverse. Call it magic when the mechanism is hidden, engineering when the mechanism is known.
Labeling something supernatural, Heinlein argues, adds no explanatory power. It neither predicts outcomes nor guides action. If a force affects the world, it enters the domain of nature and can be probed, modeled, and eventually harnessed. If it does not, it is irrelevant to how events unfold. In that sense, supernatural is a null word: it carries the posture of an answer without any content. The label short-circuits curiosity instead of feeding it.
The aphorism also honors the relativity of understanding across cultures and eras. A smartphone before the eyes of a medieval scholar, or a solar eclipse before the invention of celestial mechanics, compels awe dressed as dread or magic. Move the clock forward, add instruments and theory, and the same spectacle becomes a problem set with a timetable. This does not strip the world of enchantment; it suggests that comprehension and wonder can coexist, that the thrill of a rocket launch need not diminish when the equations are on the page.
Heinlein stands in a lineage with science fiction peers who blur the border between miracle and machine. The moral he presses is methodological: prefer questions that can be tested, terms that connect to measurement, and explanations that let you build or repair. Treat marvels as invitations to learn the rules. When confronted with the marvelous, ask not whether it is supernatural but what it does, how it works, and what can be done with it.
Labeling something supernatural, Heinlein argues, adds no explanatory power. It neither predicts outcomes nor guides action. If a force affects the world, it enters the domain of nature and can be probed, modeled, and eventually harnessed. If it does not, it is irrelevant to how events unfold. In that sense, supernatural is a null word: it carries the posture of an answer without any content. The label short-circuits curiosity instead of feeding it.
The aphorism also honors the relativity of understanding across cultures and eras. A smartphone before the eyes of a medieval scholar, or a solar eclipse before the invention of celestial mechanics, compels awe dressed as dread or magic. Move the clock forward, add instruments and theory, and the same spectacle becomes a problem set with a timetable. This does not strip the world of enchantment; it suggests that comprehension and wonder can coexist, that the thrill of a rocket launch need not diminish when the equations are on the page.
Heinlein stands in a lineage with science fiction peers who blur the border between miracle and machine. The moral he presses is methodological: prefer questions that can be tested, terms that connect to measurement, and explanations that let you build or repair. Treat marvels as invitations to learn the rules. When confronted with the marvelous, ask not whether it is supernatural but what it does, how it works, and what can be done with it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|
More Quotes by Robert
Add to List
