"One of my grandsons used to insist, when he was only 3 or 4, that he had been born and had lived in India"
About this Quote
There is a sly humility in the way Caldwell stages this moment: not as a manifesto about reincarnation, but as a family anecdote delivered with the calm matter-of-factness of lived experience. The hook is the child’s certainty, and Caldwell knows exactly what that certainty does to an adult listener. It destabilizes our tidy timeline of identity - the idea that a self begins at birth, accrues memories in order, and stays politely inside one biography.
The intent isn’t to prove anything metaphysical. It’s to dramatize how belief enters through the side door: through children, through intimacy, through the disarming authority of someone with no reason to perform. By specifying “only 3 or 4,” she sharpens the tension. That age reads as both unreliable (fantasy-prone) and uncannily “untrained” by social scripts. The grandson “insist[s],” a verb that implies friction: the adults likely corrected him; he kept returning to the claim. The subtext is less “India is mystical” than “the world is wider than the categories we use to keep it manageable.”
Then there’s the choice of India, a setting Western readers have long been taught to treat as shorthand for spirituality and ancient continuity. Caldwell taps that cultural association, but the line also hints at unease: why does this particular elsewhere feel like a plausible past? The anecdote quietly exposes how storytelling works - how the exotic becomes a vessel for the inexpressible - while inviting the reader to sit with a more provocative question: if a child can speak with such conviction about being someone else, how secure is the “someone” we think we are now?
The intent isn’t to prove anything metaphysical. It’s to dramatize how belief enters through the side door: through children, through intimacy, through the disarming authority of someone with no reason to perform. By specifying “only 3 or 4,” she sharpens the tension. That age reads as both unreliable (fantasy-prone) and uncannily “untrained” by social scripts. The grandson “insist[s],” a verb that implies friction: the adults likely corrected him; he kept returning to the claim. The subtext is less “India is mystical” than “the world is wider than the categories we use to keep it manageable.”
Then there’s the choice of India, a setting Western readers have long been taught to treat as shorthand for spirituality and ancient continuity. Caldwell taps that cultural association, but the line also hints at unease: why does this particular elsewhere feel like a plausible past? The anecdote quietly exposes how storytelling works - how the exotic becomes a vessel for the inexpressible - while inviting the reader to sit with a more provocative question: if a child can speak with such conviction about being someone else, how secure is the “someone” we think we are now?
Quote Details
| Topic | Grandparents |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Taylor
Add to List









