"One way for investors to protect themselves from a rapid change in the price of a stock is to use a limit order rather than a market order"
About this Quote
Levitt’s sentence reads like basic brokerage hygiene, but it’s really a civics lesson disguised as a trading tip. The former SEC chair isn’t just telling you how to buy a stock; he’s reminding you that markets are designed to reward speed and punish passivity unless ordinary investors insist on guardrails. A limit order is a tiny act of self-defense: you refuse to be the liquidity someone else harvests when prices lurch. A market order, by contrast, is an act of trust in a system that can move faster than your screen refresh.
The specific intent is protective and corrective. Levitt is speaking to retail investors who assume “the market price” is a single, stable thing. It isn’t. In periods of volatility, fragmented venues, thin liquidity, and algorithmic routing can turn “buy now” into “buy at whatever worst tick happens to be available.” The limit order is Levitt’s way of putting the steering wheel back in the driver’s hands: you name the price you’ll accept, and you opt out of being surprised.
The subtext is a quiet critique of the industry’s incentives. If investors default to market orders, intermediaries profit from spread, slippage, and informational advantage; the cost is invisible, scattered in pennies that add up. Levitt’s regulatory worldview shows through: transparency and investor agency matter because the market will not voluntarily hand them over.
Contextually, this comes from an era when the SEC was pushing investor education alongside modernization of market structure. It’s a simple line with a regulatory bite: protect yourself, because the market’s default settings weren’t built for you.
The specific intent is protective and corrective. Levitt is speaking to retail investors who assume “the market price” is a single, stable thing. It isn’t. In periods of volatility, fragmented venues, thin liquidity, and algorithmic routing can turn “buy now” into “buy at whatever worst tick happens to be available.” The limit order is Levitt’s way of putting the steering wheel back in the driver’s hands: you name the price you’ll accept, and you opt out of being surprised.
The subtext is a quiet critique of the industry’s incentives. If investors default to market orders, intermediaries profit from spread, slippage, and informational advantage; the cost is invisible, scattered in pennies that add up. Levitt’s regulatory worldview shows through: transparency and investor agency matter because the market will not voluntarily hand them over.
Contextually, this comes from an era when the SEC was pushing investor education alongside modernization of market structure. It’s a simple line with a regulatory bite: protect yourself, because the market’s default settings weren’t built for you.
Quote Details
| Topic | Investment |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Arthur
Add to List



