"One way we gave small businesses more money to invest was by extending tax provisions on expensing. This allows businesses to immediately write off things like equipment, without being burdened by depreciation requirements"
About this Quote
Technocracy is doing a lot of emotional work here: Hastert dresses a redistribution of benefits in the language of liberation. “Gave small businesses more money to invest” sounds like cash in hand, but the mechanism is accounting timing. Expensing doesn’t magically create new wealth; it shifts when costs get recognized, moving tax relief into the present. That’s the real pitch: not ideology so much as immediacy. “Immediately write off” is the operative phrase, a clean, satisfying verb that turns tax policy into a consumer-friendly feature.
The subtext is coalition-building. “Small businesses” is the safest mascot in American politics: sympathetic, local, job-creating by default. By centering them, Hastert smuggles in a broader pro-business tax stance without saying “corporate” or “cuts.” The enemy is bureaucratic friction, personified as “being burdened by depreciation requirements.” Depreciation isn’t just a rule; in this framing it’s a shackle. The move is classic Washington persuasion: take a complicated trade-off (reduced near-term revenue for the Treasury, uneven benefits across industries) and translate it into a morality play about entrepreneurs versus paperwork.
Context matters: early-2000s Republican governance treated investment incentives as a politically saleable form of stimulus and a proof of business-friendly credibility. Expensing provisions were often temporary, requiring repeated “extensions,” which conveniently creates an ongoing storyline of lawmakers “helping” the little guy. The line is less a policy explanation than a brand promise: government can serve growth best by getting out of the way, even if “getting out of the way” is itself a carefully engineered tax preference.
The subtext is coalition-building. “Small businesses” is the safest mascot in American politics: sympathetic, local, job-creating by default. By centering them, Hastert smuggles in a broader pro-business tax stance without saying “corporate” or “cuts.” The enemy is bureaucratic friction, personified as “being burdened by depreciation requirements.” Depreciation isn’t just a rule; in this framing it’s a shackle. The move is classic Washington persuasion: take a complicated trade-off (reduced near-term revenue for the Treasury, uneven benefits across industries) and translate it into a morality play about entrepreneurs versus paperwork.
Context matters: early-2000s Republican governance treated investment incentives as a politically saleable form of stimulus and a proof of business-friendly credibility. Expensing provisions were often temporary, requiring repeated “extensions,” which conveniently creates an ongoing storyline of lawmakers “helping” the little guy. The line is less a policy explanation than a brand promise: government can serve growth best by getting out of the way, even if “getting out of the way” is itself a carefully engineered tax preference.
Quote Details
| Topic | Business |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Dennis
Add to List
