"Only with the tools of production in their own hands could the workers ever hope to control their own lives and receive the fruits of their labor"
About this Quote
“Tools of production” sounds like dry Marxist plumbing, but Ella R. Bloor uses it as a pressure point on something intimate: who gets to decide what a life is worth. The line isn’t mainly about factories or machines; it’s about the everyday humiliations of dependence. If you don’t own the means by which you survive, you don’t just lose money. You lose leverage. You become governable.
Bloor’s intent is bluntly strategic. She’s not asking for kinder bosses or better manners from capital. She’s drawing a boundary around what reforms can and can’t accomplish. Wages, hours, safety rules - important, but ultimately conditional so long as the workplace remains someone else’s property. The subtext is a warning against treating exploitation as a glitch in the system rather than the system’s operating logic. Control over production isn’t a feel-good slogan; it’s the mechanism that turns workers from subjects into agents.
Context matters: Bloor organized through the churn of early 20th-century American labor battles, when “the fruits of their labor” was not a metaphor but a ledger entry showing wealth created by many and captured by few. Her phrasing also smuggles in a moral claim that the era’s respectable language could hear: fruit implies rightful harvest, not charity. The sentence works because it fuses material analysis with a promise of dignity, reframing labor politics as self-rule.
Bloor’s intent is bluntly strategic. She’s not asking for kinder bosses or better manners from capital. She’s drawing a boundary around what reforms can and can’t accomplish. Wages, hours, safety rules - important, but ultimately conditional so long as the workplace remains someone else’s property. The subtext is a warning against treating exploitation as a glitch in the system rather than the system’s operating logic. Control over production isn’t a feel-good slogan; it’s the mechanism that turns workers from subjects into agents.
Context matters: Bloor organized through the churn of early 20th-century American labor battles, when “the fruits of their labor” was not a metaphor but a ledger entry showing wealth created by many and captured by few. Her phrasing also smuggles in a moral claim that the era’s respectable language could hear: fruit implies rightful harvest, not charity. The sentence works because it fuses material analysis with a promise of dignity, reframing labor politics as self-rule.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|
More Quotes by Ella
Add to List
