"Opposing the free flow of goods or people is a bad idea"
About this Quote
The subtext is coalition-building. By pairing “goods” with “people,” Weld invites business-friendly conservatives and civil-libertarian moderates to see themselves on the same side. It also preempts the common rhetorical escape hatch: praising free trade while demonizing migrants, or endorsing immigration while flirting with protectionism. Weld argues, implicitly, that you can’t celebrate dynamism and then panic when dynamism shows up at the border.
Context matters: Weld is a New England-style Republican, the kind of politician who made “pro-business” mean “pro-global,” and “limited government” mean skepticism of state power over private choice. The line reads like a rebuke to the party’s populist turn, where tariffs become identity politics and immigration enforcement becomes a stage for cultural anxiety. Its strength is its bluntness. Its weakness is the same: by calling opposition a “bad idea,” it gambles that the audience already trusts the premise that openness pays, and that the costs are manageable or morally outweighed.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite | Cite this Quote |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Weld, William. (n.d.). Opposing the free flow of goods or people is a bad idea. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/opposing-the-free-flow-of-goods-or-people-is-a-117909/
Chicago Style
Weld, William. "Opposing the free flow of goods or people is a bad idea." FixQuotes. Accessed February 1, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/opposing-the-free-flow-of-goods-or-people-is-a-117909/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Opposing the free flow of goods or people is a bad idea." FixQuotes, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/opposing-the-free-flow-of-goods-or-people-is-a-117909/. Accessed 1 Feb. 2026.




