"Others like City Hall the old way, when they could make deals behind closed doors with your tax money"
About this Quote
Laura Miller’s line lands like a streetlight switched on in a back room. It’s not lyrical; it’s prosecutorial. By naming “City Hall” and “the old way,” she turns a building into a character and a habit into a system. The phrase “Others like” is a sly piece of political jiu-jitsu: she’s not just praising her own reform posture, she’s casting opponents as people with tastes, comforts, and incentives tied to opacity. Corruption isn’t framed as an aberration; it’s framed as nostalgia.
“Behind closed doors” does heavy work here. It evokes smoke-filled rooms without needing to allege a specific crime, which is useful for a politician who wants to harness public suspicion while staying on safe rhetorical ground. Then she sharpens the blade: “with your tax money.” That second-person pronoun recruits the listener as the aggrieved party and makes procedural governance feel personal, even intimate. You may not understand procurement or zoning, but you understand someone spending your money in secret.
The intent is clear: define transparency as the moral baseline and recast political negotiation as theft when it isn’t visible. The subtext is also tactical: she’s warning entrenched interests that the reformer isn’t naive about how power has operated - and signaling to voters that resistance to her agenda is self-interested, not principled.
Contextually, the quote fits the late-20th/early-21st-century municipal reform playbook, when cities sold “open government” as both ethics and efficiency, and when distrust of institutions made sunshine politics a reliable campaign weapon.
“Behind closed doors” does heavy work here. It evokes smoke-filled rooms without needing to allege a specific crime, which is useful for a politician who wants to harness public suspicion while staying on safe rhetorical ground. Then she sharpens the blade: “with your tax money.” That second-person pronoun recruits the listener as the aggrieved party and makes procedural governance feel personal, even intimate. You may not understand procurement or zoning, but you understand someone spending your money in secret.
The intent is clear: define transparency as the moral baseline and recast political negotiation as theft when it isn’t visible. The subtext is also tactical: she’s warning entrenched interests that the reformer isn’t naive about how power has operated - and signaling to voters that resistance to her agenda is self-interested, not principled.
Contextually, the quote fits the late-20th/early-21st-century municipal reform playbook, when cities sold “open government” as both ethics and efficiency, and when distrust of institutions made sunshine politics a reliable campaign weapon.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Laura
Add to List


