"Our civilization has evolved through the continuous adjustment of society to the stimulus of new knowledge"
About this Quote
Civilization, in Boyd Orr's framing, isn't a monument built once and defended forever; it's a living system forced to keep recalibrating as facts change the stakes. The key word is "stimulus": new knowledge doesn't politely request reform, it provokes it. That choice carries a politician's realism about governance: societies rarely transform because leaders become wiser; they transform because evidence makes old arrangements untenable, embarrassing, or dangerous.
Orr is writing out of a 20th-century pressure cooker where "knowledge" meant more than books and universities. It meant nutritional science, epidemiology, agricultural yields, industrial logistics, the arithmetic of rationing and welfare. As a public figure associated with food policy and public health, he would have seen how data could indict complacency: malnutrition isn't a moral failing when you can measure calories, income, and access. Once knowledge becomes legible, it becomes political. The subtext is a rebuke to tradition-as-argument and to leaders who treat social order as a fixed inheritance rather than a design problem.
There's also a quiet warning embedded in the optimism. "Continuous adjustment" implies perpetual instability: the job is never done, the consensus is never final, and power structures will always resist the next "stimulus". Orr's line flatters modernity while stressing its cost: if you want the benefits of discovery, you don't get to keep the same laws, markets, or myths untouched. The sentence is policy-minded progressivism distilled to a single mechanism: knowledge forces adaptation, and civilization is the record of how well we cope.
Orr is writing out of a 20th-century pressure cooker where "knowledge" meant more than books and universities. It meant nutritional science, epidemiology, agricultural yields, industrial logistics, the arithmetic of rationing and welfare. As a public figure associated with food policy and public health, he would have seen how data could indict complacency: malnutrition isn't a moral failing when you can measure calories, income, and access. Once knowledge becomes legible, it becomes political. The subtext is a rebuke to tradition-as-argument and to leaders who treat social order as a fixed inheritance rather than a design problem.
There's also a quiet warning embedded in the optimism. "Continuous adjustment" implies perpetual instability: the job is never done, the consensus is never final, and power structures will always resist the next "stimulus". Orr's line flatters modernity while stressing its cost: if you want the benefits of discovery, you don't get to keep the same laws, markets, or myths untouched. The sentence is policy-minded progressivism distilled to a single mechanism: knowledge forces adaptation, and civilization is the record of how well we cope.
Quote Details
| Topic | Knowledge |
|---|
More Quotes by John
Add to List







