"Our current identification system is so disjointed that the World Trade Center terrorists had a total of 63 valid driver's licenses between them"
About this Quote
A politician’s most effective trick is to turn bureaucratic trivia into existential threat, and Kingston does it in a single, brutal statistic. “So disjointed” is administrative language, but it’s deployed like an alarm bell: the sentence insists that a mundane government failure is not merely inefficient, it’s deadly. The kicker - “63 valid driver’s licenses between them” - is engineered to feel obscene, a number so high it short-circuits nuance. It’s not meant to be audited in the moment; it’s meant to be felt.
The intent is legislative momentum. By anchoring the argument to 9/11, Kingston borrows the event’s moral gravity to push identification reform (think Real ID-era politics) and to frame skepticism as irresponsibility. The subtext is that fragmentation (state-by-state rules, weak verification, porous data-sharing) equals vulnerability, and that a tougher, more centralized system is the obvious adult response.
There’s also a quieter pivot happening: the terrorists become a proxy for a broader category of “people who shouldn’t be here” or “people who shouldn’t have papers,” collapsing distinct issues - immigration enforcement, privacy, federalism, counterterrorism - into one emotionally legible package. The quote works because it weaponizes legibility itself. Driver’s licenses are everyday objects; everyone understands what it means to have one, lose one, or need one. Kingston turns that shared experience into a narrative of systemwide incompetence, then positions security policy as the corrective.
The intent is legislative momentum. By anchoring the argument to 9/11, Kingston borrows the event’s moral gravity to push identification reform (think Real ID-era politics) and to frame skepticism as irresponsibility. The subtext is that fragmentation (state-by-state rules, weak verification, porous data-sharing) equals vulnerability, and that a tougher, more centralized system is the obvious adult response.
There’s also a quieter pivot happening: the terrorists become a proxy for a broader category of “people who shouldn’t be here” or “people who shouldn’t have papers,” collapsing distinct issues - immigration enforcement, privacy, federalism, counterterrorism - into one emotionally legible package. The quote works because it weaponizes legibility itself. Driver’s licenses are everyday objects; everyone understands what it means to have one, lose one, or need one. Kingston turns that shared experience into a narrative of systemwide incompetence, then positions security policy as the corrective.
Quote Details
| Topic | Privacy & Cybersecurity |
|---|
More Quotes by Jack
Add to List



