"Our fathers valued change for the sake of its results; we value it in the act"
About this Quote
There is a quiet sting in Meynell's contrast: her "fathers" treat change like a tool, while "we" treat it like a performance. The line hinges on a moral pivot word, "value". It suggests not just different strategies but different ethics. For the previous generation, change earns its keep by delivering something tangible: reforms that stick, structures rebuilt, consequences borne. For Meynell's "we", change becomes self-justifying, a kind of aesthetic preference or spiritual posture. The act matters more than the aftermath.
The phrasing is deliberately clean, almost clinical, which is what makes it bite. "For the sake of its results" is bureaucratic language, the vocabulary of bills passed and lives measurably altered. "In the act" is theatrical: it invokes gesture, motion, the thrill of disruption. Meynell isn't anti-change; she's suspicious of change turned into identity - a way to signal modernity without paying the price of follow-through. It's a critique of restlessness disguised as progress.
Context sharpens it. Writing at the turn of the 20th century, Meynell lived through industrial acceleration, mass politics, and the emerging cult of the "new". Victorian faith in improvement was hard-nosed, sometimes brutal, but it was legible: build railways, expand empires, rewrite laws. Early modernity starts to fetishize novelty itself - speed, style, reinvention - and that shift anticipates a very current dynamic. When change is valued "in the act", it becomes addictive: the churn feels like agency, even when it leaves the world oddly unmoved.
The phrasing is deliberately clean, almost clinical, which is what makes it bite. "For the sake of its results" is bureaucratic language, the vocabulary of bills passed and lives measurably altered. "In the act" is theatrical: it invokes gesture, motion, the thrill of disruption. Meynell isn't anti-change; she's suspicious of change turned into identity - a way to signal modernity without paying the price of follow-through. It's a critique of restlessness disguised as progress.
Context sharpens it. Writing at the turn of the 20th century, Meynell lived through industrial acceleration, mass politics, and the emerging cult of the "new". Victorian faith in improvement was hard-nosed, sometimes brutal, but it was legible: build railways, expand empires, rewrite laws. Early modernity starts to fetishize novelty itself - speed, style, reinvention - and that shift anticipates a very current dynamic. When change is valued "in the act", it becomes addictive: the churn feels like agency, even when it leaves the world oddly unmoved.
Quote Details
| Topic | Embrace Change |
|---|
More Quotes by Alice
Add to List




