"Our high respect for a well read person is praise enough for literature"
About this Quote
Respect is social currency, and Eliot is pointing out who gets to spend it. The line flatters the “well read person” while quietly demoting literature itself to a kind of background technology: books matter because they produce a certain type of person we admire. That reversal is the trick. Instead of pleading for literature’s inherent value, Eliot makes a cooler, almost clinical claim about cultural prestige. We don’t need to campaign for reading, he implies; our instincts already betray what we think reading does to a mind.
The subtext is both elitist and defensive. “Well read” isn’t just about information; it signals judgment, taste, and membership in a class of people who can move through references and ideas with ease. Eliot, a modernist famously invested in tradition and “high culture,” understood that literature’s survival often depends less on mass affection than on the status system that protects it. Admiring the reader is a proxy for admiring the discipline, patience, and interior life that literature trains.
There’s also a faint jab at utilitarian arguments for reading. If you have to justify literature in terms of moral improvement or economic payoff, you’ve already conceded too much. Eliot’s formulation smuggles in a stronger defense: literature doesn’t need slogans; it has produced a recognizable human type we still esteem. The line works because it frames cultural value as something revealed by behavior, not argued on principle - a diagnosis of how societies actually honor art, even when they pretend not to.
The subtext is both elitist and defensive. “Well read” isn’t just about information; it signals judgment, taste, and membership in a class of people who can move through references and ideas with ease. Eliot, a modernist famously invested in tradition and “high culture,” understood that literature’s survival often depends less on mass affection than on the status system that protects it. Admiring the reader is a proxy for admiring the discipline, patience, and interior life that literature trains.
There’s also a faint jab at utilitarian arguments for reading. If you have to justify literature in terms of moral improvement or economic payoff, you’ve already conceded too much. Eliot’s formulation smuggles in a stronger defense: literature doesn’t need slogans; it has produced a recognizable human type we still esteem. The line works because it frames cultural value as something revealed by behavior, not argued on principle - a diagnosis of how societies actually honor art, even when they pretend not to.
Quote Details
| Topic | Book |
|---|
More Quotes by S. Eliot
Add to List







