"OUR history begins before we are born. We represent the hereditary influences of our race, and our ancestors virtually live in us"
About this Quote
Nasmyth’s line has the brisk certainty of a Victorian engineer watching the world run on hidden mechanisms. “Our history begins before we are born” doesn’t just poeticize ancestry; it frames identity as inheritance with torque. Coming from an inventor, the metaphor is almost tactile: you are not a blank slate, you’re a machine assembled from prior parts, already set in motion by forces you didn’t choose.
The intent is double-edged. On one level it’s a humbling corrective to the self-made myth: individual achievement is never purely individual. On another, it’s a period tell. Mid-19th-century Britain was intoxicated with heredity as an explanatory system, from early evolutionary thinking to the era’s flirtations with “race” science. Nasmyth’s phrasing, especially “hereditary influences of our race,” carries the subtext of a culture eager to naturalize hierarchy, to treat social outcomes as biological destiny. The sentence reads like common sense precisely because it borrows the authority of engineering: if traits are transmitted like design specifications, then inequality can be waved off as the product of “influences” rather than policy.
What makes it work rhetorically is the quiet haunting in “our ancestors virtually live in us.” “Virtually” gives him plausible deniability (not superstition, just influence), while still smuggling in a vivid image of occupation: the self as a crowded house. Today, the line lands differently. Genetics and epigenetics give it new plausibility, while the word “race” triggers warranted skepticism. Nasmyth inadvertently models a recurring cultural temptation: to let inheritance explain everything, because it’s cleaner than confronting history’s choices.
The intent is double-edged. On one level it’s a humbling corrective to the self-made myth: individual achievement is never purely individual. On another, it’s a period tell. Mid-19th-century Britain was intoxicated with heredity as an explanatory system, from early evolutionary thinking to the era’s flirtations with “race” science. Nasmyth’s phrasing, especially “hereditary influences of our race,” carries the subtext of a culture eager to naturalize hierarchy, to treat social outcomes as biological destiny. The sentence reads like common sense precisely because it borrows the authority of engineering: if traits are transmitted like design specifications, then inequality can be waved off as the product of “influences” rather than policy.
What makes it work rhetorically is the quiet haunting in “our ancestors virtually live in us.” “Virtually” gives him plausible deniability (not superstition, just influence), while still smuggling in a vivid image of occupation: the self as a crowded house. Today, the line lands differently. Genetics and epigenetics give it new plausibility, while the word “race” triggers warranted skepticism. Nasmyth inadvertently models a recurring cultural temptation: to let inheritance explain everything, because it’s cleaner than confronting history’s choices.
Quote Details
| Topic | Legacy & Remembrance |
|---|
More Quotes by James
Add to List
