"Our lifetime may be the last that will be lived out in a technological society"
About this Quote
A threat dressed as a prophecy: Clarke suggests that “technological society” isn’t our default setting but a temporary phase, liable to end within a single human lifespan. Coming from a science-fiction writer who built his reputation on lucid, almost bureaucratic speculation, the line lands with an unsettling calm. No fireworks, no villain. Just the quiet implication that the system we mistake for permanent is as fragile as any other arrangement humans have tried.
The intent feels double-edged. On one side, it’s a warning about collapse: energy limits, environmental blowback, nuclear risk, institutional fragility. Clarke wrote across the Cold War and into the computer age, when the future looked both electrifying and terminal. “May be the last” is the key hedge, a scientist’s modesty used as rhetorical leverage: it invites you to imagine the worst while sounding reasonable.
The subtext is also a critique of technological society as a lived condition, not a gadget inventory. Clarke isn’t saying devices will disappear; he’s asking whether the social scaffolding that makes complex technology possible - stable supply chains, education, peace, governance, trust in expertise - can survive its own contradictions. The line needles modern complacency: we treat progress like a ratchet, but history runs on reversals.
What makes it work is its temporal intimacy. Clarke pulls apocalypse out of the abstract and pins it to “our lifetime,” turning distant catastrophe into personal accounting. It’s less about predicting the end than about puncturing the fantasy that the future automatically belongs to us.
The intent feels double-edged. On one side, it’s a warning about collapse: energy limits, environmental blowback, nuclear risk, institutional fragility. Clarke wrote across the Cold War and into the computer age, when the future looked both electrifying and terminal. “May be the last” is the key hedge, a scientist’s modesty used as rhetorical leverage: it invites you to imagine the worst while sounding reasonable.
The subtext is also a critique of technological society as a lived condition, not a gadget inventory. Clarke isn’t saying devices will disappear; he’s asking whether the social scaffolding that makes complex technology possible - stable supply chains, education, peace, governance, trust in expertise - can survive its own contradictions. The line needles modern complacency: we treat progress like a ratchet, but history runs on reversals.
What makes it work is its temporal intimacy. Clarke pulls apocalypse out of the abstract and pins it to “our lifetime,” turning distant catastrophe into personal accounting. It’s less about predicting the end than about puncturing the fantasy that the future automatically belongs to us.
Quote Details
| Topic | Technology |
|---|
More Quotes by Arthur
Add to List
