"Our mass movement will shatter this communal, fascist and autocratic center"
About this Quote
“Our mass movement” is doing a lot of political work here: it’s both a promise of street-level muscle and a claim to democratic legitimacy. Lalu Prasad Yadav, a politician whose brand has long fused populist energy with anti-elite rhetoric, frames power as something properly seized by the many, not negotiated by the few. The verb “shatter” isn’t persuasion; it’s demolition. It signals impatience with procedural niceties and a readiness to turn politics into a confrontation where the outcome is not reform but rupture.
The target is also carefully constructed. “Center” reads like a geographic descriptor, but in Indian political language it’s shorthand for Delhi, the Union government, and the institutional ecosystem around it: bureaucracy, media, and national parties. By labeling that center “communal, fascist and autocratic,” Yadav stacks three charges that speak to different anxieties at once. “Communal” invokes majoritarian polarization and the weaponization of religious identity. “Fascist” is an escalation meant to internationalize the moral stakes, turning opponents into a category of regime rather than a rival party. “Autocratic” narrows it to leadership style: concentrated power, weakened institutions, and contempt for dissent.
The subtext is coalition-making. Yadav isn’t only attacking an adversary; he’s offering a shared vocabulary for disparate groups - minorities, lower-caste constituencies, civil libertarians, and regional parties - to see themselves as one front. It’s also a warning: if the center is illegitimate, extraordinary resistance becomes thinkable. The line works because it converts ideology into momentum, turning outrage into a marching order.
The target is also carefully constructed. “Center” reads like a geographic descriptor, but in Indian political language it’s shorthand for Delhi, the Union government, and the institutional ecosystem around it: bureaucracy, media, and national parties. By labeling that center “communal, fascist and autocratic,” Yadav stacks three charges that speak to different anxieties at once. “Communal” invokes majoritarian polarization and the weaponization of religious identity. “Fascist” is an escalation meant to internationalize the moral stakes, turning opponents into a category of regime rather than a rival party. “Autocratic” narrows it to leadership style: concentrated power, weakened institutions, and contempt for dissent.
The subtext is coalition-making. Yadav isn’t only attacking an adversary; he’s offering a shared vocabulary for disparate groups - minorities, lower-caste constituencies, civil libertarians, and regional parties - to see themselves as one front. It’s also a warning: if the center is illegitimate, extraordinary resistance becomes thinkable. The line works because it converts ideology into momentum, turning outrage into a marching order.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Lalu
Add to List



