"Our purpose is simply to ask how theological principles can be shown to have usable secular analogues that throw light upon the nature of language"
About this Quote
Burke is smuggling a dare into a modest-sounding research agenda: treat theology not as a rival to secular thought but as its most underappreciated toolkit for explaining what language does. The line’s cleverness is in the word “usable.” He’s not proposing pious translation or vague metaphor-hunting; he wants working parts you can move from the sacred to the everyday without losing their force. If “principles” survive that transfer, they’re not merely religious content. They’re structural insights about symbol-making itself.
The subtext is classic Burkean suspicion of purity. Modern secular culture loves to imagine it has outgrown religious frameworks, yet it keeps reenacting them in disguised form: guilt becomes “accountability,” sin becomes “harm,” redemption becomes “rehabilitation,” ritual becomes “procedure,” salvation becomes “progress.” Burke’s bet is that these are not embarrassing leftovers but clues. Theology, in his view, is a long, disciplined record of how humans handle motives, hierarchy, sacrifice, and identification - the very dramas language stages whenever it assigns praise and blame.
Context matters: Burke is writing out of a 20th-century moment when linguistics and criticism often chased scientific neutrality. He pushes back by insisting that language isn’t just a transparent medium for facts; it’s a generator of attitudes and obligations. By asking for “secular analogues,” he can speak to modern skepticism while still honoring religion as a sophisticated laboratory of rhetoric. Theology becomes less a creed than a magnifying glass, making visible the moral machinery humming inside ordinary words.
The subtext is classic Burkean suspicion of purity. Modern secular culture loves to imagine it has outgrown religious frameworks, yet it keeps reenacting them in disguised form: guilt becomes “accountability,” sin becomes “harm,” redemption becomes “rehabilitation,” ritual becomes “procedure,” salvation becomes “progress.” Burke’s bet is that these are not embarrassing leftovers but clues. Theology, in his view, is a long, disciplined record of how humans handle motives, hierarchy, sacrifice, and identification - the very dramas language stages whenever it assigns praise and blame.
Context matters: Burke is writing out of a 20th-century moment when linguistics and criticism often chased scientific neutrality. He pushes back by insisting that language isn’t just a transparent medium for facts; it’s a generator of attitudes and obligations. By asking for “secular analogues,” he can speak to modern skepticism while still honoring religion as a sophisticated laboratory of rhetoric. Theology becomes less a creed than a magnifying glass, making visible the moral machinery humming inside ordinary words.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Kenneth
Add to List

